Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Statistical prediction method of inclined shaft blasting fragmentation based on dynamic damage distribution in excavated rock mass

Enterprise AI Analysis

Statistical prediction method of inclined shaft blasting fragmentation based on dynamic damage distribution in excavated rock mass

This study addresses challenges in inclined shaft blasting excavation by proposing a novel statistical prediction method for rock fragmentation. It integrates field blasting experiments and LS-DYNA numerical simulations to establish a mapping between dynamic damage distribution and fragmentation gradation. The model achieves high accuracy (R²=0.9689) with a maximum field validation deviation of 2.49%, demonstrating strong engineering applicability. Key parameters—decoupling coefficient, blasthole spacing, and detonating delay time—were optimized. Results show that reducing the decoupling coefficient and decreasing blasthole spacing significantly enhance fragmentation and fine particle content, while detonating delay has a more limited, auxiliary role. The optimized parameters effectively reduce oversized fragments, improving blasting efficiency and economic viability for complex underground projects.

Executive Impact & Key Metrics

0.9689R² Prediction Model Accuracy
2.49% Max Field Validation Deviation
28.12% Oversized Fragment Reduction

Problem Statement

Inclined shaft blasting excavation faces critical challenges, particularly pilot shaft blockage due to oversized rock fragments. This necessitates precise control over post-blast rock fragmentation to ensure smooth debris removal, avoid secondary blasting, and reduce manual clearing workloads, which are essential for the efficiency and economic viability of reverse pilot shaft expansion methods.

Solution Description

The proposed solution introduces a dynamic damage distribution-based prediction model for rock fragmentation in inclined shafts. By statistically mapping simulated damage distribution to observed fragmentation gradation, this method provides a data-efficient and mechanistically sound framework. It allows for optimized blasting parameters (decoupling coefficient, blasthole spacing, detonating delay) to achieve desired fragmentation, thereby preventing pilot shaft blockage and improving construction efficiency.

28.12% Reduction in oversized fragments (boulder yield) post-optimization, ensuring smooth debris removal and reducing secondary blasting.

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Blasting Fragmentation Control

This category focuses on methods and models for precisely controlling the size distribution of rock fragments after blasting. It covers empirical formulas, machine learning approaches, and novel dynamic damage distribution models designed to enhance prediction accuracy and optimize blasting parameters to prevent issues like oversized fragments and blockages.

Numerical Simulation & Material Modeling

This section delves into the application of advanced numerical simulation platforms (e.g., LS-DYNA) and material constitutive models (e.g., RHT model) to accurately represent rock mass behavior under explosive loads. It includes detailed parameter determination, meshing strategies, and boundary conditions for simulating dynamic damage evolution and fragmentation processes in complex geotechnical environments.

Underground Engineering & Optimization

This area addresses the practical challenges and solutions in inclined shaft excavation for projects like pumped storage power stations. It involves optimizing blasting designs, considering economic viability, operational safety, and specific construction requirements such as debris transportation and avoiding pilot shaft blockages. The focus is on translating theoretical models into implementable engineering strategies.

0.9689R² The proposed damage distribution-based prediction model achieved very high fitting accuracy.

Enterprise Process Flow

Field Blasting Experiments
LS-DYNA Numerical Simulations
Dynamic Damage Distribution Analysis
Statistical Mapping Relationship
Fragmentation Prediction Model Development
Optimization of Blasting Parameters

Comparison of Prediction Methods

Method Advantages Limitations
Traditional Empirical Formulas (Kuz-Ram, CZM)
  • Simple, convenient for quick estimates.
  • Relies on simplified geometric assumptions and statistical regression.
  • Neglects intrinsic dynamic damage mechanisms.
  • Limited adaptability to complex geological conditions and confined spaces.
Machine Learning Approaches (ANN, SVR)
  • Achieves high prediction accuracy.
  • Strongly depends on large volumes of high-quality training data.
  • Requires substantial computational resources.
  • Often unrealistic for site-specific projects with limited field data.
Proposed Dynamic Damage Distribution Model
  • Integrates field tests and numerical simulations.
  • Establishes statistical mapping between damage and fragmentation.
  • Mechanistic and data-efficient framework.
  • Accurate prediction under confined blasting spaces.
  • Overcomes limitations of empirical/data-driven methods.
  • Requires on-site calibration and high-precision numerical simulation (costly).
  • Limited universality for highly jointed rock masses (without explicit joint networks in simulation).
28.12% Reduction in boulder yield achieved post-optimization, significantly improving mucking efficiency.

Tianchi Pumped Storage Power Station: Optimized Blasting Impact

The study was applied to the lower inclined shaft section of the No. 2 water diversion tunnel. Optimized parameters (decoupling coefficient k=1.31, detonating delay Δt=2ms, blasthole spacing s=0.69m) led to a significant reduction in oversized fragments. Specifically, the boulder yield decreased from 6.33% to 4.55%, a 28.12% reduction. This ensures smooth debris removal, prevents pilot shaft blockage, and improves overall construction efficiency and economic viability, validating the engineering applicability and promotional value of the proposed method.

Advanced ROI Calculator

Estimate the potential cost savings and efficiency gains for your enterprise by adopting AI-driven solutions.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating AI, from strategy to sustainable impact.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

In-depth analysis of current operations, identifying AI opportunities, setting clear objectives, and developing a tailored AI strategy aligned with business goals. This involves workshops, data audits, and stakeholder interviews.

Phase 2: Pilot & Proof-of-Concept

Develop and deploy a small-scale AI pilot project to validate the technology, demonstrate ROI, and gather initial feedback. This phase focuses on rapid iteration and measurable results to build internal confidence.

Phase 3: Scaled Implementation

Roll out the AI solution across relevant departments, integrating with existing systems. This includes comprehensive training, change management, and establishing robust monitoring and support frameworks.

Phase 4: Optimization & Expansion

Continuously monitor performance, refine AI models, and explore new applications. This phase ensures sustained value, identifies further opportunities for AI-driven transformation, and keeps your enterprise at the forefront of innovation.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Book a complimentary 30-minute strategy session with our AI experts to explore how these insights can drive tangible results for your business.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking