Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: A Study on Factors Influencing Designers' Behavioral Intention in Using AI-Generated Content for Assisted Design: Perceived Anxiety, Perceived Risk, and UTAUT

Enterprise AI Analysis

A Study on Factors Influencing Designers' Behavioral Intention in Using AI-Generated Content for Assisted Design: Perceived Anxiety, Perceived Risk, and UTAUT

This study aims to comprehensively understand the intention to use Artificial Intelligence Generated Assistance in Design Tools (AIGC) among design students and practitioners, along with its influencing factors. Utilizing Smart-PLS software and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) technique, we constructed a comprehensive research model. Based on 404 valid questionnaire responses, we systematically analyzed the underlying mechanisms of designers' attitudes towards AIGC tools. The sample encompasses diverse schools and levels of professional experience, ensuring the wide applicability of research outcomes. In the data analysis process, professional statistical analysis methods, including path analysis and standardized path coefficients, were employed to ensure a profound exploration of research questions. The results indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions significantly positively influence the willingness to use AIGC tools, while perceived anxiety and perceived risk exert negative impacts. This study, by integrating traditional and novel factors, provides crucial theoretical and practical guidance for the actual application of AIGC technology in the design field, offering profound insights for the future development and education of design technology.

Executive Impact: Key Metrics

AI-powered tools drive significant improvements across key operational metrics.

17776 Article Views
59 Citing Articles

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

The study utilizes the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to understand user adoption behavior. Key constructs like Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, and Facilitating Conditions are examined for their impact on designers' behavioral intention.

Beyond UTAUT, the study introduces Perceived Anxiety and Perceived Risk as novel factors influencing behavioral intention. Perceived anxiety relates to concerns about negative impacts and uncertainty, while perceived risk covers potential problems like ethical, copyright, and privacy issues.

The research specifically investigates designers' behavioral intention to use AI-Generated Content (AIGC) for assisted design. The findings provide crucial theoretical and practical guidance for the application and future development of AIGC technology in the design field.

Enterprise Process Flow

Designers encounter AIGC tools
Form initial perceptions (Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, Perceived Anxiety, Perceived Risk)
These perceptions influence Behavioral Intention
Decision to Adopt or Resist AIGC tools
76.2% of Behavioral Intention (BI) variance explained by the model
Factor Positive Impacts on Behavioral Intention Negative Impacts on Behavioral Intention
Performance Expectancy
  • Increased confidence in AI tools' ability to improve work efficiency and design quality.
  • Anticipation of higher-quality designs and more opportunities.
Social Influence
  • Peer adoption and positive feedback motivate usage.
  • Desire to align with professional standards and avoid ostracism.
Perceived Risk
  • Concerns about ethical issues, privacy, and copyright.
  • Hesitation due to potential negative consequences.
Perceived Anxiety
  • Skepticism about tool effectiveness.
  • Concerns about job security and the future relevance of skills.

Impact of Gender on AI Adoption

The study reveals a significant moderating effect of gender on the relationship between effort expectations and performance expectations. For female designers, the coefficient from effort expectations (EE) to performance expectations (PE) is 0.234 higher compared to male designers.

Outcome: Female designers are more inclined to translate anticipated benefits of technology into actual adoption intentions, suggesting differing motivational pathways for AI tool adoption.

Quantify Your AI Advantage

Use our calculator to estimate your potential annual savings and reclaimed hours with AI implementation.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Estimated Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

Understand the typical phases of integrating AI into your design processes.

Phase 1: Awareness & Initial Exposure

Designers become aware of AIGC tools through industry trends and peer discussions.

Phase 2: Evaluation & Trial

Designers explore tool capabilities, considering performance and effort expectations, while also evaluating perceived risks and anxieties.

Phase 3: Integration & Adaptation

Successful trials lead to integration into design workflows, supported by positive social influence and facilitating conditions.

Phase 4: Continuous Learning & Optimization

Ongoing use and skill enhancement, adapting to new features and mitigating remaining risks through community engagement.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Book a free 30-minute consultation with our AI strategists to discuss how these insights apply to your business and craft a tailored AI adoption plan.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking