Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Identifying Suitability for Data Reduction in Imbalanced Time-Series Datasets

AI RESEARCH PAPER ANALYSIS

Identifying Suitability for Data Reduction in Imbalanced Time-Series Datasets

This research explores data reduction techniques for imbalanced time-series datasets, particularly in the context of occupancy detection using machine learning. It introduces novel methods for identifying useful data based on centroid distance and class density, aiming to optimize training processes, reduce energy costs, and maintain model performance. The study demonstrates that up to 50% of data can be removed from imbalanced datasets without performance loss, significantly cutting training time and CO2 emissions. It also investigates dataset fusion, finding it less effective for heterogeneous occupancy data but highlighting the importance of data-centric AI approaches.

Key Enterprise Impact

This study provides actionable insights for optimizing AI model training and deployment, leading to significant resource savings and enhanced sustainability in enterprise applications.

0 Data Reduction Achieved
0 Training Time Reduction
0 Energy & CO2 Cost Savings

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Introduction & Background

The paper begins by highlighting the significance of optimized occupancy detection for energy efficiency and the challenges posed by large, imbalanced time-series datasets in machine learning. It frames data reduction as a crucial step towards 'green AI' and efficient model training, citing existing dimensionality reduction and data pruning techniques. The importance of non-intrusive sensing methods for privacy-preserving occupancy detection is also emphasized.

Methodology

This section details the experimental setup, focusing on the HPDMobile dataset. It outlines the process of dataset preparation, including data imputation for missing values and homogenisation for dataset fusion. The core contribution lies in the development of five data reduction strategies based on centroid distance: random, central, lateral, data even, and data squash exclusion. It also introduces the class density calculation as a metric to assess data reduction suitability, and specifies the use of Random Forest models for classification, alongside AUC-ROC and p-values for evaluation.

Results & Discussion

The results demonstrate that for heavily imbalanced datasets like Site Alpha, Charlie, and Delta, majority class data reduction can maintain or even improve AUC-ROC performance by balancing class densities. Up to 50% data reduction was achieved with significant reductions in training runtime and associated energy/CO2 costs. However, for already balanced or less abundant datasets (Beta, Epsilon, Fazbear), data reduction was less beneficial. Dataset fusion across heterogeneous occupancy sites proved less effective than individual site training due to data format differences and increased computational overhead.

Conclusion & Future Work

The paper concludes that class density is a robust metric for determining the suitability of a dataset for reduction. It confirms that data reduction, particularly targeted at the majority class, can significantly optimize AI training for imbalanced time-series datasets by reducing resources without compromising performance. Future work will explore performing data reduction on individual datasets prior to fusion and reducing datasets to a much smaller, balanced set to observe impact on model reliability in new domains.

Key Finding

50% Average Data Reduction (Majority Class)

Data Reduction Strategies: Benefits & Suitability

Strategy Description Primary Benefit Applicability
Majority Class Reduction Removes data only from the larger class to balance the dataset. Improved class balance, maintained/improved AUC-ROC for imbalanced datasets.
  • Highly suitable for imbalanced datasets (e.g., Alpha, Charlie, Delta).
Pure Data Reduction (Both Classes) Removes data indiscriminately from both classes. General reduction in dataset size.
  • Less beneficial, often leads to performance decrease, especially for balanced datasets.
Lateral Exclusion Removes datapoints with the largest class centroid distance. Effective for highly imbalanced datasets.
  • Showed good performance on Site Charlie.
Data Squash Removes datapoints proportionally to local density across bins. Effective for highly imbalanced datasets.
  • Showed good performance on Site Charlie and Delta, and Fazbear (5% reduction).

Enterprise Process Flow

Collect Raw Time-Series Data
Pre-process & Impute Missing Data
Calculate Class Centroid Distances
Determine Class Density
Apply Reduction Strategy (Majority Class Focus)
Train & Evaluate AI Model (RF)
Achieve Optimized Performance & Reduced Costs

Case Study: Site Charlie - Significant Impact

Site Charlie, one of the largest and most imbalanced datasets (300,000+ datapoints, 22:78 class balance), showed remarkable improvements. With a 50% reduction in its majority class data using the 'data squash' method, its AUC-ROC performance not only remained stable but, in some cases, slightly improved. Critically, this reduction nearly halved the training runtime from 44 seconds to 26 seconds, demonstrating substantial energy and CO2 savings without compromising model accuracy. This highlights the practical benefits of targeted data reduction for large, imbalanced datasets.

0 Dataset Size
0 Max Reduction
0 Training Time Cut

Advanced AI ROI Calculator

Estimate the potential operational savings and efficiency gains by implementing data reduction strategies in your enterprise AI applications. Optimize training costs and accelerate model deployment.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Our AI Implementation Roadmap

Partner with us to integrate these cutting-edge data reduction strategies into your AI initiatives, ensuring a smooth transition to more efficient and sustainable operations.

Phase 1: Data Audit & Strategy

Comprehensive review of your existing time-series datasets, identification of imbalance patterns, and development of a tailored data reduction strategy based on class density analysis.

Phase 2: Pilot Implementation

Apply selected data reduction techniques to a pilot project. Train and evaluate models (e.g., Random Forest) on reduced datasets, demonstrating performance maintenance and resource savings.

Phase 3: Scalable Deployment

Integrate data reduction pipelines into your existing AI workflows. Scale the solution across relevant enterprise applications, ensuring optimized training times and reduced operational costs.

Phase 4: Continuous Optimization

Establish monitoring for class density and model performance. Refine reduction strategies based on new data and evolving requirements, ensuring long-term efficiency and 'green AI' principles.

Ready to Optimize Your AI?

Unlock the full potential of your time-series data with smart reduction techniques. Reduce costs, accelerate insights, and build a greener AI future.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking