Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Primary teachers' acceptance and sustained adoption of AI powered learner corpora for writing instruction through TAM and ECM perspectives

Enterprise AI Analysis

Primary teachers' acceptance and sustained adoption of AI powered learner corpora for writing instruction through TAM and ECM perspectives

This study investigates factors influencing primary school teachers' acceptance and sustained use of AI-powered learner corpora for writing instruction in Malaysia, utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM). Key findings highlight the pivotal roles of perceived self-efficacy and interest as strong predictors of perceived usefulness and continuance intention. While facilitating conditions did not significantly impact perceived ease of use, the study emphasizes intrinsic motivation. The research offers practical insights for designing AI tools that align with pedagogical needs, enhance user experience, and support sustainable integration in primary education, noting that experienced teachers emphasize operational simplicity and overall user experience more, while novice teachers rely on self-efficacy and ease of use.

Executive Impact

0 Primary School Teachers Surveyed
0 Teachers Observing Significant Improvements
0 Overall Questionnaire Reliability (Cronbach's Alpha)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Theoretical Implications
Practical Implications
Ethical Considerations

Summary of Theoretical Implications

The study significantly advances TAM and ECM by critically examining their continued relevance for AI-powered learner corpora in writing instruction for primary education. Intrinsic motivators (Perceived Self-Efficacy, Interest) emerged as the most influential factors, challenging conventional narratives that foreground institutional support. This suggests AI adoption is driven more by teachers' psychological ownership and pedagogical alignment than by external factors. The findings highlight the duality of AI tools' potential to empower teacher agency and require new literacies.

0.448 Perceived Self-Efficacy (PSE) impact on Perceived Usefulness (PU) (p < 0.001)
0.222 Interest impact on Perceived Usefulness (PU) (p = 0.002)
0.005 Facilitating Conditions (FC) impact on Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) (p = 0.943 - NOT SIGNIFICANT)

Summary of Practical Implications

Practical insights suggest fostering users' Perceived Self-Efficacy (PSE) and stimulating learning interest are pivotal. Educational institutions and teacher trainers should prioritize targeted professional development programs with hands-on practice. Integrating interactive elements, gamification, personalized feedback, and progress tracking can enrich the learning experience. Optimizing user experience is vital; iterative design informed by user feedback is recommended. Support strategies should be differentiated based on users' digital literacy.

Implementation Milestones

Phase 1: Tiered Mentoring Program

Pair experienced teachers with novice teachers. Mentors deliver classroom demonstrations and coaching, offering immediate feedback and opportunities to build on successful experiences.

Phase 2: Modular Online Micro-credential Courses

Develop short (5-10 minute) modules on NLP error annotation, exemplar retrieval, and rewrite suggestion generation. Participants receive digital badges and professional development credits.

Phase 3: Online Community & AI Writing Innovation Design Competition

Foster peer review and sustained motivation. Teachers propose instructional designs, submit case studies, and expert panels review entries for research grant funding.

Enterprise Process Flow

Schools adopt iterative, collaborative co-design frameworks
AI co-creation team formed (in-service teachers, research coordinator, technical engineer)
Quarterly workshops: analyze challenges, functional requirements
Draft feature list & integration plan
Prototype iteration workshops (Design Thinking methodology)
Teachers test new features in classrooms, offer enhancement suggestions
Development team adjusts model parameters, interface layouts, interaction logic
On-site developer days: gather user challenges, demonstrate latest software version, provide brief training

Summary of Ethical Considerations

Several ethical considerations must be proactively addressed. To reduce algorithmic bias, schools can adopt a layered governance model blending independent auditing with classroom-level safeguards. External review boards should run fairness diagnostics and publish 'model cards'. Teachers need micro-credentials in critical AI literacy to detect biased feedback, rebalance corpora, and lead reflective talks. Data privacy is critical: strict anonymisation protocols, secure storage, and informed consent for all data usage, especially concerning minors, are paramount. Future applications require explicit ethical approval and compliance with local data protection regulations.

Aspect Traditional AI Tool AI-powered Learner Corpora
Data Source Generic, pre-trained data Authentic learner writing samples
Feedback Type Automated error detection, generic adaptive scaffolding Contextualized, peer-example-linked feedback, prompts for reflection
Bias Mitigation Potential for algorithmic bias, generic norms Designed to preserve linguistic and cognitive characteristics of young learners, less plagiarism risk

Advanced ROI Calculator

Our advanced AI solutions can significantly boost efficiency in writing instruction. Use the calculator below to estimate potential annual savings and reclaimed hours for your institution.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Estimated Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Implementation Roadmap

A phased approach to integrate AI into your writing instruction successfully, ensuring sustainable adoption and maximum impact.

Phase 1: Discovery & Assessment

Initial consultations to understand current writing instruction methodologies, identify key challenges, and assess existing technological infrastructure. Define clear objectives and success metrics for AI integration.

Phase 2: Pilot Program & Customization

Deploy AI-powered learner corpora in a limited pilot group of primary school teachers. Gather feedback for initial customization, ensuring the tool aligns with specific pedagogical needs and curriculum requirements. Conduct initial teacher training.

Phase 3: Full-Scale Integration & Advanced Training

Roll out the AI solution across all relevant primary school classes. Provide comprehensive, tiered training for all teachers, focusing on advanced features, data interpretation, and ethical use. Establish ongoing technical support.

Phase 4: Optimization & Scalability

Continuously monitor performance, collect user feedback, and implement iterative improvements. Explore opportunities for scaling the solution to other subjects or grade levels, ensuring long-term sustainability and impact.

Ready to Transform Your Writing Instruction?

Book a free 30-minute consultation with our AI integration specialists to discuss how AI-powered learner corpora can elevate your primary school's educational outcomes.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking