LOST IN PHONATION: VOICE QUALITY VARIATION AS AN EVALUATION DIMENSION FOR SPEECH FOUNDATION MODELS
Lost in Phonation: Voice Quality Variation as an Evaluation Dimension for Speech Foundation Models
This paper introduces VQ-Bench, a new evaluation suite for Speech Foundation Models (SFMs) focusing on voice quality variations like creaky and breathy voice. It evaluates SFM responses in long-form generation and speech emotion recognition tasks, revealing that voice quality significantly influences model behavior and aligns with human perceptual biases, including gender-linked asymmetries. The work provides a reproducible corpus and an open-ended evaluation protocol to probe paralinguistic sensitivity in speech models.
Executive Impact at a Glance
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
This paper outlines the creation of VQ-Bench, a new parallel dataset featuring synthesized modifications to voice quality (modal, breathy, creaky, end-creak). It uses F5-TTS for synthesis and VoiceQualityVC for modifications. Evaluation involves long-form generation tasks and speech emotion recognition (SER), using LLM judges and fine-tuned Wav2Vec 2.0 models.
Voice quality significantly alters SFM responses in long-form tasks. Breathy and end-creak voices elicit more affiliative/care-oriented responses, while creaky voice produces reserved/authority-linked judgments. Gender biases are also observed, with female voices systematically rated lower in interview tasks for 'Salary offer' and 'Leadership endorsement'.
| Voice Quality Effect | Breathy/End-Creak | Creaky | Female Voices |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career Advice (STEM vs Care) |
|
|
|
| Interview (Shortlist Decision) |
|
|
|
Voice quality significantly affects SER predictions. Breathy voice increases 'calm' and 'neutral' predictions while decreasing 'fearful' and 'surprised'. Creaky voice decreases 'fearful' and 'happy'. End-creak reduces 'fearful'. Female voices positively influence 'fearful' and 'surprised' predictions.
Enterprise Process Flow
SFMs risk reproducing human biases if voice quality is not evaluated. This includes gender-linked asymmetries impacting decision-making in job interviews. The SER model can help develop hypotheses on communicative functions of voice qualities. Future work needs to include gender-ambiguous and non-binary voices.
Mitigating Bias in AI
The study highlights the critical need to address paralinguistic biases in SFMs to prevent amplification of human stereotypes, particularly in high-stakes applications like hiring. Developing robust evaluation frameworks like VQ-Bench is crucial for responsible AI deployment and ensuring fair outcomes across diverse voice qualities and speaker demographics.
Estimate Your Enterprise ROI
Quantify the potential impact of integrating voice quality-aware SFMs into your business operations. Tailor the parameters to your organization's specifics.
Your Phased Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: VQ-Bench Integration & Baseline
Integrate VQ-Bench into your existing SFM evaluation pipeline. Establish baseline performance metrics for voice quality sensitivity across your key models and use cases.
Phase 2: Model Fine-tuning & Adaptation
Fine-tune SFMs with diverse voice quality data, focusing on critical paralinguistic features. Implement adaptive learning strategies to minimize bias and improve robust understanding.
Phase 3: Ethical AI Auditing & Deployment
Conduct thorough ethical AI audits on voice quality interpretations. Deploy enhanced SFMs with built-in monitoring for paralinguistic sensitivity and continuous improvement cycles.
Ready to Transform Your AI with Voice Quality Awareness?
Our experts specialize in developing and evaluating SFMs that truly understand the nuances of human speech. Schedule a personalized consultation to explore how VQ-Bench can enhance your enterprise AI strategy.