Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative Al Use in University Computing Education

Enterprise AI Analysis

Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative Al Use in University Computing Education

This study reveals significant cross-cultural differences in how Canadian and South Korean university students perceive the ethical use of Generative AI (GenAI) in computing education, highlighting the need for culturally responsive AI integration policies.

Executive Impact Snapshot

Generative AI tools are reshaping academic integrity debates. This study, comparing student perceptions at Canadian and South Korean universities, found that Canadian students were consistently more likely to view GenAI use as unethical and against institutional policies, despite functionally identical rules. The amount of AI-generated code strongly influenced ethical judgments. Hofstede's cultural dimensions (power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance) offer a framework for understanding these differences, emphasizing that equitable AI integration requires culturally responsive guidelines rather than universal mandates.

310+ Students Surveyed
85%+ Significant Perceptual Difference
0.85 Ethicality-Rules Correlation

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Explore the systematic approach taken to investigate student perceptions of GenAI use, from scenario construction to data interpretation.

Enterprise Process Flow

Construct Scenarios (GenAI Use Cases)
Code Scenarios (Amount, Understanding, Stage)
Administer Survey (Likert Scale)
Collect Student Responses (Canada & S. Korea)
Perform Statistical Analysis (ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U)
Interpret Cross-Cultural Differences

Understand the core outcomes of the study, highlighting the significant disparities and influencing factors in student ethical judgments.

Perception Divergence: Canada vs. South Korea

Canadian Students (Individualistic, Low Power Distance) South Korean Students (Collectivist, High Power Distance)
  • Consistently more likely to view GenAI use as unethical.
  • More likely to view GenAI use as against institutional rules.
  • Heightened sensitivity to academic integrity breaches.
  • Prioritize individual achievement and ethical responsibility.
  • More permissive attitudes towards AI-assisted learning.
  • Perceive knowledge as communal/shared resource.
  • Navigate GenAI use within culturally embedded framework.
  • Prioritize conformity and group cohesion.
Amount of AI-Generated Code Dominant factor influencing ethical judgments. Higher amounts led to stronger ethical concerns.

Delve into the theoretical framework used to interpret observed cross-cultural differences in GenAI perceptions.

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Framework

Hofstede's theory identifies dimensions like power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, and uncertainty avoidance that significantly shape academic integrity perceptions. Canadian culture (low power distance, high individualism) emphasizes personal accountability, leading to stricter anti-plagiarism norms. South Korean culture (high power distance, collectivist) emphasizes respect for authority and communal knowledge, often rationalizing AI-assisted work as collaborative learning, not misconduct. This framework is crucial for understanding the observed cross-cultural variations in GenAI ethical reasoning.

Advanced ROI Calculator

Estimate your potential savings and efficiency gains by optimizing workflows with tailored AI solutions, informed by leading research.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Implementation Roadmap

Our phased approach ensures a smooth, ethical, and culturally sensitive integration of AI into your enterprise, maximizing impact and minimizing disruption.

Establish Culturally Responsive Governance Frameworks

Proactively develop frameworks that are both ethical and sensitive to diverse cultural norms and perceptions of academic integrity.

Develop Explicit GenAI Usage Policies

Clarify distinctions between acceptable assistance and unauthorized content generation, tailored to local norms regarding individual achievement and group support.

Implement Culturally Sensitive AI Literacy Programs

Educate students on ethical AI use, emphasizing technical competencies, critical thinking, and academic integrity within diverse cultural contexts.

Regular Review and Adaptation of Academic Integrity Codes

Ensure policies remain relevant as technologies evolve and student cultural expectations shift, supporting responsible innovation and core educational values.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Book a complimentary strategy session with our AI experts to discuss how these insights apply to your unique organizational challenges and opportunities.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking