Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Generative AI as Digital Representatives in Collective Decision-Making: A Game-Theoretical Approach

AI & GAME THEORY

Generative AI as Digital Representatives in Collective Decision-Making: A Game-Theoretical Approach

This paper introduces a novel game-theoretical framework to analyze the strategic information revelation of human members to Generative AI (GenAI) agents acting as digital representatives in collective decision-making. It addresses the critical challenge of accurately representing individual preferences while accounting for communication costs and strategic interactions.

Authors: Kexin Chen, Jianwei Huang, and Yuan Luo from The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen and affiliated research centers.

Executive Impact: Key Findings at a Glance

This research uncovers critical dynamics for deploying GenAI as digital representatives, revealing both challenges and opportunities for enterprise decision-making.

Yes Paradoxical Individual Alignment with Digital Reps
More Info Conflicting Preferences Lead to Strategic Information Revelation
Possible Overall Loss Reduction When Manual Participation Costs Are High
Critical GenAI System Capability For Maximizing Benefits

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Game-Theoretical Model
Performance Comparison
Practical Implications

Enterprise Process Flow: Strategic Information Revelation

Member Preferences
Strategic Revelation (am)
GenAI Learns (θ'm)
Team Decision (θT)
Member Loss Calculation (Lm)
Strategic Balance Between Preference Alignment & Communication Cost Drives Revelation
Characteristic Conflicting Preferences (κA,B < 0) Aligned Preferences (κA,B > 0)
Revelation Behavior
  • Competitive: More information revealed to prevent team decision deviation.
  • Free-Riding: Less information revealed, relying on others' revelations.
Equilibrium Outcome
  • Higher revelation levels.
  • Balanced team outcome, closer to baseline.
  • Lower revelation levels.
  • Potential for sub-optimality due to insufficient information.
Team Decision Gap
  • Closer alignment with ideal baseline decision.
  • Larger deviation from ideal baseline decision.
≥ Baseline Equilibrium Preference Loss is Generally Higher or Equal to Direct Participation
Metric Digital Representatives (GenAI) Direct Participation (Baseline)
Team Decision Alignment
  • Closely approximates baseline, especially with conflicting preferences.
  • Perfectly aligns (theoretical optimum).
Preference Loss
  • Generally higher due to imperfect/partial information revelation.
  • Theoretical minimum.
Total Loss (Incl. Communication Costs)
  • Lower for high manual cost/complex tasks.
  • Lower for low manual cost/routine tasks.
Possible Individual Members Can Achieve Lower Preference Losses with GenAI

Optimizing GenAI Deployment in Enterprise Decision-Making: Key Recommendations

For high-cost, complex decision-making tasks (e.g., strategic planning, negotiations), GenAI digital representatives can significantly reduce overall team loss by automating information aggregation and communication. In scenarios with conflicting team member preferences, GenAI agents foster a competitive revelation dynamic that leads to outcomes closely approximating direct participation. Invest in advanced GenAI systems (lower trigger price 'p') to expand benefits to a wider range of preferences and reduce total team loss. Be aware that while aggregate preference loss may be higher, individual members might experience paradoxical gains in preference alignment, especially when manual participation costs are prohibitive or GenAI systems are sufficiently advanced.

Crucial Advanced GenAI Systems (Lower Trigger Price 'p') Reduce Total Loss and Expand Benefits

Advanced ROI Calculator

Estimate your potential annual savings and reclaimed hours by integrating AI into your enterprise workflows.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating Generative AI as digital representatives in your organization.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

Assess current decision-making workflows, identify key stakeholders, define measurable objectives for GenAI integration, and conduct a detailed preference mapping exercise for critical roles.

Phase 2: Pilot & Customization

Develop a pilot program with a small team. Customize GenAI models to accurately reflect identified preferences and strategic objectives. Establish clear communication protocols between human members and their digital representatives.

Phase 3: Integration & Training

Roll out GenAI representatives to a broader audience. Provide comprehensive training for team members on strategic information revelation and interpreting GenAI outputs. Integrate GenAI with existing enterprise collaboration tools.

Phase 4: Optimization & Scaling

Continuously monitor GenAI performance, preference alignment, and team decision outcomes. Iterate on model training and information revelation strategies based on feedback. Scale successful implementations across the organization.

Ready to Transform Your Collective Decision-Making?

Unlock the strategic advantages of Generative AI as digital representatives. Schedule a free consultation with our experts to discuss your tailored implementation plan.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking