Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Insulin Management and Hypoglycemia Prevention in Hospitalized Patients—A Scoping Review

Enterprise AI Research Analysis

Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Insulin Management and Hypoglycemia Prevention in Hospitalized Patients—A Scoping Review

By Eileen R. Faulds, Melanie Natasha Rayan, Matthew Mlachak, Kathleen M. Dungan, Ted Allen, and Emily Patterson – Published: 2026

Dysglycemia remains a persistent challenge in hospital care, with current insulin management heavily reliant on reactive methods. This scoping review highlights how AI, through predictive modeling and adaptive insulin control, offers transformative potential. While strong algorithmic performance is demonstrated, clinical validation remains limited, underscoring the need for co-designed, interpretable systems integrating continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and real-time workflow testing to advance safe and adaptive insulin management in hospital settings.

Executive Impact & Key Findings

This research provides critical insights for healthcare enterprises looking to leverage AI for improved inpatient glycemic management, highlighting significant progress and areas for strategic investment.

0 Studies Analyzed
0 Max Predictive Accuracy
0 Time-in-Range Increase
0 ICU-Focused Studies

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Understanding the Spectrum of AI in Glycemic Control

The review highlights a dynamic evolution in AI algorithms for inpatient glycemic management. Early efforts focused on Model Predictive Control (MPC), while recent advancements show a proliferation of Neural Networks (ANN, RNN, Deep Learning), Tree-based Ensemble Models (XGBoost, Gradient Boosting), and emerging Reinforcement Learning (DQN) and Transformer architectures. Each method brings unique strengths to prediction and control, reflecting increasing sophistication in handling complex physiological data.

Critical Applications for Hospital AI

AI algorithms are being developed for several key use cases: IV insulin automation for precise glucose control in ICUs, glucose prediction to forecast short- and medium-term trajectories, proactive hypoglycemia prevention to identify at-risk patients, insulin sensitivity modeling for personalized dosing, and subcutaneous insulin dose optimization. These applications aim to move inpatient care from reactive to proactive, reducing adverse events and clinician burden.

The Foundation: Data Streams for AI Models

Input data for these AI models is evolving. Initial systems relied on intermittent Point-of-Care (POC) glucose measurements and basic patient demographics. More advanced models now integrate rich, multimodal Electronic Health Record (EHR) data, including labs, vital signs, medications, and nutritional status. Critically, the rise of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) offers high-resolution, real-time data, which is essential for the next generation of predictive and closed-loop systems.

Measuring Success & Addressing Challenges

Reported outcomes include improved mean glucose and Time in Target Range (TIR) in early MPC trials, and high predictive accuracy (AUROC 0.80–0.96) for later ML models in glucose forecasting and hypoglycemia risk. However, challenges remain: most studies lack real-world clinical validation, generalizability across diverse hospital settings, robust assessment of usability and workflow integration, and ensuring model interpretability for clinician trust. These limitations highlight a gap between algorithmic performance and tangible clinical benefits.

Enterprise Process Flow: Evolution of AI in Glycemic Management

Early MPC Systems (2006-2010)
Emergence of Neural Networks (2018)
Proliferation of ML & Tree-based Models (2020)
Advanced RL & Transformer Architectures (2024)
0.96 Highest AUROC for Hypoglycemia Prediction

Leading machine learning models demonstrated exceptional predictive power in identifying patients at risk of low glucose events, reaching an AUROC of 0.96, signifying strong discrimination for proactive intervention strategies.

Comparative Analysis of AI Methods for Inpatient Glycemic Control

AI Method Strengths Limitations
Model Predictive Control (MPC)
  • Stable, safe glucose control in prospective trials
  • Reduces manual calculations, smooth dosing adjustments
  • Requires frequent glucose input
  • Does not "learn" from new data (not true AI)
  • Limited by intermittent POC testing
Tree-based Models (XGBoost, Gradient Boosting)
  • High accuracy (AUROC often >0.85)
  • Robust to missing EHR data
  • Interpretable importance scores
  • Model calibration and thresholds required for safety
  • May not generalize across hospitals
Deep Learning (RNN/LSTM)
  • Excellent at using trends and time-series data
  • Strong short-term predictive accuracy
  • Captures nonlinear, multivariable relationships
  • Can degrade with missing or irregular data
  • Requires dense CGM-like inputs
  • "Black box" reasoning (interpretability challenges)
Reinforcement Learning (RL/DQN)
  • Can personalize insulin delivery dynamically
  • Learns long-term optimal strategies through trial and error
  • Mostly validated in silico (simulation)
  • Requires safety constraints and extensive real-world testing

The CGM Data Imperative for Scalable AI

The review highlights that AI-based insulin algorithms cannot scale clinically in the inpatient setting without routine deployment of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). CGM provides the high-resolution data streams essential for real-time decision support and advanced model learning, moving care from reactive to proactive. This technological advancement is a prerequisite for the next generation of hospital AI decision support systems, enabling more precise and adaptive glycemic control.

Calculate Your Potential AI Impact

Estimate the operational efficiency gains and cost savings your enterprise could achieve by implementing intelligent automation in critical workflows, based on industry benchmarks.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

Translating groundbreaking AI research into clinical practice requires a structured approach. Our roadmap guides you through the critical phases for successful enterprise AI deployment in healthcare.

Phase 1: Co-Design & Interpretability

Develop transparent, interpretable AI models in collaboration with frontline clinicians and medical staff to build trust and ensure seamless integration with existing workflows.

Phase 2: Multicenter Prospective Validation

Conduct rigorous, multicenter clinical trials to validate AI algorithms in diverse hospital settings, ensuring generalizability and real-world reliability beyond initial studies.

Phase 3: CGM Integration & Real-time Evaluation

Fully integrate Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) data streams for real-time model evaluation, adaptive learning, and enabling true closed-loop insulin delivery systems.

Phase 4: Workflow Integration & Usability Testing

Embed AI systems seamlessly into clinical workflows, conducting extensive usability and human factors testing to account for time pressures, staffing, and alarm fatigue.

Phase 5: Regulatory Clearance & Commercial Deployment

Navigate regulatory pathways to achieve necessary clearances (e.g., FDA) and prepare for the widespread commercial deployment of safe, effective, and adaptive AI solutions.

Ready to Transform Inpatient Care with AI?

Leverage cutting-edge AI to enhance insulin management, prevent hypoglycemia, and improve patient outcomes. Book a personalized strategy session with our experts today.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking