Enterprise AI Analysis
Development of novel symbolic regression models for prediction of nano filters efficiency using CFD and DPM
This study pioneers an integrated CFD-DPM and AI framework for predicting nanofilter efficiency, revealing non-linear dependencies on inlet velocity and particle density. A novel Symbolic Regression model achieves R² > 0.998, offering a highly accurate and interpretable tool for filter design. Global sensitivity analysis confirmed inlet velocity as the dominant factor (μ ≈ 70), followed by particle density (μ ≈ 5), while particle number density had negligible impact (μ ≈ 0). This work provides a data-driven alternative to computationally expensive simulations, enabling optimized next-generation nanofiber filtration systems for diverse applications like face masks.
Executive Impact
Unlock superior filtration performance and design efficiency with data-driven AI models.
0
Prediction Accuracy (R²)
0
Inlet Velocity Sensitivity
0
Particle Density Sensitivity
0
Particle Number Sensitivity
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
The study utilized a comprehensive CFD-DPM framework to analyze nanofiber media filtration, incorporating Maxwell slip boundary conditions and Brownian force effects. This approach accurately simulated complex fluid-particle interactions for predicting filtration efficiency and pressure drop, crucial for nanoscale phenomena. It provides a robust foundation for understanding the system's underlying physics.
1500 Pa
Max Pressure Drop observed at 20 cm/s
Pressure drop showed a linear increase from 100 Pa to 1500 Pa across the inlet velocity range of 1 to 20 cm/s, consistent with laminar flow regimes.
Enterprise Process Flow
CFD-DPM Simulations
→
Data Generation
→
ANN Surrogate Model Training
→
Morris Sensitivity Analysis
→
Symbolic Regression Model Derivation
Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and Symbolic Regression (SR), were integrated to overcome the computational expense of CFD-DPM simulations. The ANN model served as an accurate surrogate (R² > 0.999) for global sensitivity analysis, while Symbolic Regression derived explicit, interpretable mathematical correlations for filtration efficiency.
| Model | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| ANN (Surrogate) |
|
|
| Symbolic Regression |
|
|
99.8%
Symbolic Regression R² (Training & Testing)
The novel explicit correlation for filtration efficiency achieved remarkable accuracy, confirming its reliability for practical applications.
The analysis revealed a non-monotonic and highly non-linear relationship between filtration efficiency and input parameters. Inlet velocity was the most sensitive factor, with efficiency decreasing from 96% at 1 cm/s to 42% at 15 cm/s. Particle density also played a significant, velocity-dependent role, while particle number density had a negligible impact.
Optimized Face Mask Design
For face mask applications, the findings indicate that optimal performance can be achieved by tuning inlet velocity and particle density. Lower flow rates (1-5 cm/s) maximize efficiency (90%+) due to dominant Brownian diffusion, while higher rates (15-20 cm/s) see efficiency stabilize (42-55%) as inertial impaction compensates. This allows for targeted design based on desired protection level and breathing comfort.
Highlight: Achieving 96% efficiency at 1 cm/s for respiratory protection.
96% -> 42%
Efficiency Range (1 cm/s to 15 cm/s)
Filtration efficiency is highly sensitive to inlet velocity, demonstrating a significant drop then slight recovery.
Calculate Your Potential ROI
Estimate the efficiency gains and cost savings AI can bring to your filtration or material design processes.
Estimated Annual Savings
$0
Hours Reclaimed Annually
0
Your AI Implementation Roadmap
A typical phased approach to integrate AI for predictive modeling and optimization in material science and engineering.
Phase 1: Data Preparation & Model Training
Gathering and pre-processing CFD-DPM simulation data. Training the ANN surrogate model and validating its accuracy. Setting up the Symbolic Regression environment.
Phase 2: Sensitivity Analysis & Correlation Derivation
Conducting global sensitivity analysis using the Morris method to rank parameter importance. Running Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression to derive explicit efficiency correlations.
Phase 3: Model Refinement & Deployment
Refining the derived correlations for interpretability and simplicity. Integrating the predictive models into a practical design tool for nanofiber filtration systems. Documenting the framework for future applications.
Ready to Transform Your Engineering Design?
Schedule a free consultation to explore how AI-driven predictive modeling can accelerate your R&D and optimize product performance.
Ready to Get Started?
Book Your Free Consultation.
Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!
Lets Discuss Your Needs
Select a Date
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat