Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Usability, acceptability, and future opportunities of mobile health (mHealth) apps for caregiver health decision making for children: a scoping review

ENTERPRISE AI ANALYSIS

Usability, acceptability, and future opportunities of mobile health (mHealth) apps for caregiver health decision making for children: a scoping review

This scoping review comprehensively investigates the usability of mHealth apps designed to assist caregivers in making health decisions for children. It identifies common features, user feedback, and future opportunities to enhance app effectiveness and user experience.

Key Enterprise Impact Metrics

Our analysis reveals critical data points driving innovation in mHealth for pediatric care decision support.

0 Studies Analyzed
0% E-learning Feature Adoption
0 Core Features Identified
0% Clinical Trial Participation

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

App Focus Areas
Development Lifecycle
User Perception & Requests

Common mHealth App Focus Areas

The majority of mHealth apps targeting caregivers for children fall into specific categories, reflecting prevalent needs in pediatric care:

  • Maternity & Infant Care (46%): Apps centered on pregnancy, childbirth, early parenting, and infant health.
  • Disease-Specific Focus (28%): Applications designed to monitor, evaluate, and manage specific conditions like pediatric cancer, obesity, and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM).
  • Vaccination (7%): Apps aimed at influencing vaccination decisions and encouraging uptake.
  • Children's Health Education & Improving Healthcare Quality (approx. 4% each): Apps enhancing caregiver knowledge on health topics or improving overall patient care quality.
  • Health Device Management (3%): Focusing on planning and managing health devices in pediatric care.

These distributions highlight high-impact areas for mHealth development.

mHealth Agile Development Lifecycle

Understanding the development phases indicates the maturity and focus of mHealth apps for caregivers:

  • Approximately 20% of reviewed papers covered multiple phases of the Agile Development Lifecycle.
  • Effectiveness/Clinical Trial (Phase III) was the most common phase, utilized in 38% of studies, indicating a strong focus on validating health outcomes.
  • Usability Testing (Phase II) followed at 28%, ensuring apps are user-friendly.
  • Alpha Review (Phase I) was present in 24% of studies, focusing on initial functionality and feedback.
  • Implementation (Phase IV) occurred in 13%, indicating real-world deployment.
  • User requirement identification, the foundational phase, was reported in only 25% of studies.

This data points to a robust evaluation pipeline, though earlier stages could benefit from more formal reporting.

Caregiver Perception & Feature Requests

Caregivers provided valuable feedback on existing features and highlighted areas for improvement and new capabilities:

  • Positive Feedback: Apps were perceived as helpful, empowering informed decisions, and providing convenient access to information. Features like alerts and personalized feedback were particularly well-received.
  • Concerns: Issues included technical glitches, inappropriate design (e.g., complex navigation), ambiguous terminology, difficulties connecting with external devices, and data entry limitations (e.g., inability to correct errors).
  • Requested Features: Caregivers desired comprehensive content (e.g., integrating insurance coverage checks, in-depth explanations of medical terms), increased user engagement (more choices, activities, games, imaginary friends), and usage flexibility (deleting/replacing self-reported data, integrating different app purposes, uploading images for review by nurses).

These insights are crucial for guiding future mHealth app design to better meet caregiver needs.

Scoping Review Methodology Flow

Initial Search: 1,014 Records
Screening: 675 Unique Titles/Abstracts
Eligibility Assessment: 123 Full Texts (+12 from citation search)
Included in Review: 55 Studies
61% of apps reviewed included E-learning features, making it the most common individual app feature.

Common App Features and User Feedback

Feature Caregiver Feedback (Likes/Concerns/Requests)
E-learning Features
  • Liked for providing right amount of concise, useful, easy-to-understand information.
  • Concerns about quality, reliability, and bias of information; ambiguous terms.
Personalization & Customization
  • Valued for individualized feedback, culturally adjusted information, and control over reminders/notifications.
  • Some felt customization was inadequate, desired more options.
Health Tracking Features
  • Recognized as helpful for self-monitoring, improved awareness, and precise reporting (child-adapted).
  • Concerns: children forgot to log, technical issues with external devices, general data fields, inability to correct errors.
Navigation Features
  • Perceived as easy to use and understand.
  • Concerns: long swiping motions, complicated for young children, need for better error recovery and task completion guidance.
Alerts, Reminders, Notifications
  • Found reliable, motivated app use, provided convenient access to info (pop-ups, daily updates), liked picture/text formats.
  • No significant negative comments identified.
Gamification Features
  • Found helpful, innovative, engaging; motivated frequent use, active information seeking; progression elements reinforced behavior.
  • Some caregivers were not in favor of "gamifying" apps to increase utilization.
Goal Setting Features
  • Appreciated for creating long-term/short-term motivation, preferred clear and engaging content.
  • Criticized limited incentives beyond stickers.
Health Visualization/Display
  • Found easy to understand, visually aided monitoring, avoided feeling overwhelmed, increased confidence.
  • Some preferred actual values over graphs/charts, only cared about normal ranges.
Integration with Healthcare Resources
  • Liked for gathering numbers/info in one place, quick responses from providers/hospitals.
  • Providers did not proactively use chat functions.
Social Features
  • Offered timely support, increased engagement, good place to ask infant-related questions.
  • Concerns: moderation, bullying, unreliable advice, requested professional moderator.
Health Assessment Features
  • Found useful for learning to identify/manage health conditions, aiding progress assessment/diagnosis.
  • Concerns: unnecessary for repeated use, questionnaire too difficult to interpret.
Role-Based Features
  • Allowed therapists and doctors to monitor/manage patients' health.
  • Little specific feedback recorded in studies.

Driving Innovation: Overall Impact & Future Opportunities

This review highlights that while mHealth apps are often useful in supporting caregiver decision-making for children, critical areas for improvement exist. Caregivers value apps that provide credible, consistent, and personalized information, ideally tailored to their cultural background and child’s age.

Future development should focus on enhancing content comprehensiveness (e.g., integrating insurance data, in-depth terminology explanations), increasing user engagement through more interactive options and games, and improving usage flexibility (e.g., better data management, unified app purposes, image uploads for professional review).

Addressing these specific concerns and integrating requested features will significantly improve the effectiveness and usability of mHealth apps, empowering caregivers further in making informed health decisions for children.

Calculate Your Potential AI-Driven ROI

Estimate the time and cost savings your organization could achieve by implementing advanced AI solutions based on this research.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating AI for enhanced caregiver support and decision-making.

Strategic Assessment & Requirement Gathering

Identify specific caregiver decision-making pain points, conduct stakeholder interviews, and define measurable objectives for mHealth app integration, leveraging insights on desired features and concerns from this review.

Solution Design & Feature Prioritization

Architect mHealth app solutions with a focus on E-learning, personalization, and robust health tracking. Prioritize features addressing identified caregiver needs (e.g., comprehensive content, enhanced engagement, flexible data management).

Pilot Deployment & Usability Testing

Implement a pilot program with a subset of caregivers. Conduct rigorous usability testing (Phase II) focusing on navigation, data input, and clarity of information, incorporating feedback on technical issues and ambiguous terms.

Full-Scale Integration & Continuous Optimization

Roll out the enhanced mHealth solution across the organization. Establish mechanisms for ongoing monitoring (Phase IV) and incorporate continuous feedback loops to refine features and address emerging caregiver needs and technological advancements.

Ready to Transform Caregiver Decision-Making with AI?

Our experts are ready to guide you through the opportunities highlighted in this analysis. Let's build a future where every caregiver is empowered with intelligent tools.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking