Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Designing Understandable and Fair AI for Learning: The PEARL Framework for Human-Centered Educational AI

Enterprise AI Analysis

Designing Understandable and Fair AI for Learning: The PEARL Framework for Human-Centered Educational AI

As artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in classrooms, tutoring systems, and learning platforms, it is essential that these tools are not only powerful, but also easy to understand, fair, and supportive of real learning. Many current AI systems can generate fluent responses or accurate predictions, yet they often fail to clearly explain their decisions, reflect students' cultural contexts, or give learners and educators meaningful control. This gap can reduce trust and limit the educational value of AI-supported learning. This paper introduces the PEARL framework, a human-centered approach for designing and evaluating explainable AI in education. PEARL is built around five core principles: Pedagogical Personalization (adapting support to learners' levels and curriculum goals), Explainability and Engagement (providing clear, motivating explanations in everyday language), Attribution and Accountability (making AI decisions traceable and justifiable), Representation and Reflection (supporting fairness, diversity, and learner self-reflection), and Localized Learner Agency (giving learners control over how AI explains and supports them). Unlike many existing explainability approaches that focus mainly on technical performance, PEARL emphasizes how students, teachers, and administrators experience and make sense of Al decisions. The framework is demonstrated through simulated examples using an AI-based tutoring system, showing how PEARL can improve feedback clarity, support dif-ferent stakeholder needs, reduce bias, and promote culturally relevant learning. The paper also introduces the PEARL Composite Score, a practical evaluation tool that helps assess how well educational AI systems align with ethical, pedagogical, and human-centered principles. This study includes a small exploratory mixed-methods user study (N = 17) evaluating example AI tutor interactions; no live classroom deployment was conducted. Together, these contributions offer a practical roadmap for building educational AI systems that are not only effective, but also trustworthy, inclusive, and genuinely supportive of human learning.

Executive Impact Summary

The PEARL Framework (Pedagogical Personalization, Explainability & Engagement, Attribution & Accountability, Representation & Reflection, and Localized Learner Agency) provides a human-centered approach to designing and evaluating explainable AI in education. It addresses the limitations of current AI systems by emphasizing transparency, fairness, and learner control. Simulated case studies demonstrate PEARL's ability to improve feedback clarity, support diverse stakeholder needs, reduce bias, and promote culturally relevant learning. The PEARL Composite Score offers a practical tool for assessing AI systems' alignment with ethical and pedagogical principles. An exploratory user study (N=17) indicates positive perceptions regarding clarity, engagement, and fairness.

77/100 Compliance Score
60% Learner Agency
4.4/5 Feedback Clarity
80% Ethical Alignment

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Focuses on the need for AI systems to go beyond accurate predictions to help users understand why specific decisions are made, emphasizing user-centered utility and contextual relevance for effective explanations.

Highlights that AI systems must be understandable, fair, and designed around human needs, not just technical accuracy. This forms the foundation for recent work and directly motivates the PEARL framework.

Identifies that many current educational AI systems use technical explanation methods inaccessible to non-experts, lack standardized metrics, and often fail to promote learning, fairness, or learner agency.

17.0 Normalized Score (0-20)

The highest-performing dimension, reflecting effectiveness in delivering clear, cognitively appropriate, and positively received justifications, fostering transparency and engagement.

PEARL Framework Components Workflow

The PEARL framework is a cyclical model of five interdependent dimensions, emphasizing continuous interaction rather than isolated implementation.

Pedagogical Personalization
Explainability & Engagement
Attribution & Accountability
Representation & Reflection
Localized Learner Agency

PEARL vs. Existing XAI Frameworks

PEARL distinguishes itself by integrating personalization, explanation adaptivity, traceability, fairness, and cultural agency, addressing key limitations of prior models.

Framework Focus Area PEARL's Advantage
Clancey & Hoffman (2021) Teacher-centered trust calibration
  • Adds student agency, cultural localization, explanation adaptivity.
Explanatory Learner Models (Rosé et al., 2019) Transparent learner modeling
  • Incorporates broader fairness auditing, cultural context, and explanation personalization.
XAI in Education Survey (Liu et al., 2024) XAI techniques in dashboards and prediction systems
  • Offers a unified design/evaluation framework and learner control mechanisms.

Student Example: Making Feedback More Helpful (R1)

Scenario: A student receives vague feedback: 'You should revisit your understanding of algebraic transformations.' This lacks diagnostic clarity and can reduce motivation.

PEARL Solution: PEARL enables actionable guidance: 'You missed 3 out of 5 questions on factoring quadratic expressions. Would you like to see a worked example similar to Question 3?' This transforms AI into a supportive tutor, promoting learner agency and personalized growth. This highlights Pedagogical Personalization (P), Explainability & Engagement (E), and Localized Learner Agency (L).

Estimate Your AI Implementation Impact

See how much time and cost savings AI can bring to your educational institution.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A phased approach to integrating the PEARL framework into your AI-driven learning systems.

Phase 1: Assessment & Strategy

Evaluate current AI systems against PEARL principles, identify gaps, and define a human-centered AI strategy tailored to your institution's needs. Conduct stakeholder workshops to gather requirements.

Phase 2: Pilot & Prototyping

Develop and pilot PEARL-aligned components, focusing on one or two dimensions (e.g., Explainability & Engagement, Pedagogical Personalization). Use the PEARL Composite Score for iterative refinement.

Phase 3: Integration & Scaling

Integrate refined PEARL components across broader AI systems. Implement robust data governance for Attribution & Accountability and Representation & Reflection. Scale successful pilots across departments.

Phase 4: Monitoring & Refinement

Continuously monitor system performance using the PEARL Composite Score. Conduct ongoing user feedback sessions and refine AI explanations, personalization, and agency features based on real-world usage and evolving ethical guidelines.

Next Steps for Your Enterprise

Ready to design and implement AI systems that truly support learning and human development? Let's discuss how PEARL can transform your educational AI initiatives.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking