Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Optimized Decision Model for Soil-Moisture Control Lower Limits and Evapotranspiration-Based Irrigation Replenishment Ratios Based on AquaCrop-OSPy, PyFAO56, and NSGA-II and Its Application

Enterprise AI Analysis

Optimized Decision Model for Soil-Moisture Control Lower Limits and Evapotranspiration-Based Irrigation Replenishment Ratios Based on AquaCrop-OSPy, PyFAO56, and NSGA-II and Its Application

As water resources are becoming increasingly scarce in the North China Plain, irrigation strategies that simultaneously improve grain yield and reduce irrigation water input are needed for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production. Current irrigation decision rules are based either on fixed soil moisture thresholds or on evapotranspiration (ET)-based ratios applied uniformly across the growing season, limiting their flexibility for growth stage-specific irrigation management. In this study, a multi-objective simulation optimization framework was developed to jointly optimize soil moisture lower control limits (irrigation trigger thresholds) and evapotranspiration-based irrigation replenishment ratios across key winter wheat growth stages. The framework integrated the AquaCrop-OSPy crop model with the PyFAO56 soil moisture balance, irrigation scheduling model and the NSGA-II evolutionary optimization algorithm. A field experiment was conducted during the 2024–2025 growing season in Laoling City, Shandong Province, China, employing a four-dense-one-sparse strip cropping pattern with two irrigation treatments: T1 (subsurface sprinkler irrigation) and T2 (shallow subsurface drip irrigation). The AquaCrop-OSPy model was calibrated and validated using measured canopy cover, aboveground biomass, grain yield, and soil moisture content in the 0-60 cm soil layer. Simulated canopy cover and grain yield showed good agreement with observations, with the coefficient of determination (R2) ranging from 0.87 to 0.94. For grain yield, the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) ranged from 2.24% to 3.75%, and the root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.29 to 0.54 tha⁻¹. For aboveground biomass, R2 was 0.99, while RMSE ranged from 1.02 to 1.11 tha⁻¹, and NRMSE ranged from 14.25% to 15.49%. The PyFAO56 irrigation strategy model simulated average root-zone soil-moisture dynamics with satisfactory accuracy, with an R2 of 0.86 and an RMSE of 5%. Multi-objective optimization (maximizing yield while minimizing irrigation volume) generated 23 Pareto-optimal irrigation strategies, with irrigation volumes ranging from 51 to 128 mm, corresponding yields ranging from 9.8 to 10.8 tha⁻¹, and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) ranging from 0.08 to 0.19 tha⁻¹·mm⁻¹. Correlation analysis within the Pareto set indicated that soil-moisture control lower limits during the regreening-jointing stage and higher soil-moisture control lower limits during the flowering-maturity stage were key controlling factors for achieving high yields and irrigation water use efficiency. The Entropy-Weighted Ranked Minimum Distance method identified an optimal irrigation scheme involving two irrigations (one at the end of the jointing stage and another at the beginning of the grain filling stage) involving an irrigation depth of 75 mm, achieving a simulated yield of 10.4 t·ha⁻¹ and an IWUE of 0.16 t·ha⁻¹·mm⁻¹. The proposed AquaCrop-PyFAO56-NSGA-II framework provides a flexible, process-based workflow for jointly optimizing irrigation control thresholds and evapotranspiration-based irrigation replenishment ratios across different winter wheat growth stages. Under the monitored conditions of the 2024–2025 wet season, the framework identified a two-irrigation strategy that balanced grain yield and irrigation input. This study should, therefore, be regarded as a proof-of-concept evaluation conducted in a well-instrumented single-site field setting rather than as a universally transferable recommendation. Because model calibration, within-season validation, and optimization were all based on one wet growing season at one site, the derived stage-specific thresholds, Pareto front, and S5 recommendation are most applicable to hydro-climatic conditions similar to the study year and should be further tested across contrasting year-types and locations before broader extrapolation.

Executive Impact Summary

This study presents a novel multi-objective optimization framework that can significantly enhance winter wheat production efficiency in water-scarce regions. By dynamically adjusting irrigation parameters across growth stages, agricultural enterprises can achieve superior yields with reduced water input, translating directly into improved profitability and resource sustainability.

0 Optimal Grain Yield Achieved
0 Irrigation Water Use Efficiency
0 Total Irrigation Volume for Optimal Scheme

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Core Insights & Strategic Implications

Drip Irrigation Superiority: The study unequivocally demonstrates that shallow-buried drip irrigation (T2) significantly outperforms subsurface sprinkler irrigation (T1) in grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE), while requiring less water. This suggests a strong business case for investing in drip irrigation infrastructure for winter wheat cultivation.

Stage-Specific Optimization: The optimized model emphasizes the importance of dynamic, stage-specific irrigation control rather than fixed thresholds. Higher soil moisture thresholds during regreening-jointing and slightly lower thresholds during flowering-maturity, combined with ET-based replenishment, were key to achieving optimal results.

Balanced Yield and Water Conservation: The NSGA-II framework generated Pareto-optimal solutions that highlight the trade-off between maximizing yield and minimizing irrigation. The identified optimal strategy (S5) balances high grain yield (~10.4 t·ha⁻¹) with reduced water use (75 mm total irrigation), providing a blueprint for sustainable agriculture.

Predictive Modeling Accuracy: The AquaCrop-OSPy and PyFAO56 models showed strong agreement with field observations for canopy cover, biomass, yield, and soil moisture dynamics, establishing a reliable foundation for data-driven irrigation management and forecasting.

Technological Integration for Precision: The framework's success hinges on integrating crop models, irrigation strategy models, and multi-objective optimization algorithms, facilitated by smart field sensing and valve control. This holistic approach is essential for modern precision agriculture.

Enterprise Process Flow

Intelligent Irrigation Equipment & Data Collection
AquaCrop-OSPy & PyFAO56 Simulation (Coupled)
NSGA-II Multi-Objective Optimization
Pareto Optimal Solution Set Generation
Entropy Weight Method for Ranking
Optimal Stage-Wise Irrigation Strategy

Comparative Performance of Irrigation Methods

Metric T1: Subsurface Sprinkler Irrigation T2: Shallow-buried Drip Irrigation
Grain Yield (t·ha⁻¹) 9.52 10.86
Water Use Efficiency (t·ha⁻¹·mm⁻¹) 0.025 0.032
Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (t·ha⁻¹·mm⁻¹) 0.073 0.083
Total Irrigation Volume (mm) 153.0 (76.50 + 76.50) 130.2 (65.10 + 65.10)
Key Advantages
  • Less surface evaporation (compared to traditional furrow)
  • Good canopy expansion rates
  • Higher grain yield (14% increase over T1)
  • Higher WUE & IWUE (28% & 14% increase over T1)
  • Lower total irrigation volume
  • Concentrates water in root zone, reducing non-productive losses
  • Improved root-zone microenvironment
  • Maintains stronger post-anthesis physiological activity

Field Experiment: Shandong Province, China (2024-2025)

This study was validated through a one-year field trial during the 2024–2025 winter wheat growing season in Laoling City, Dezhou, Shandong Province, China. The region is characterized by a warm temperate continental monsoon climate and loamy to sandy loam soil.

The experiment utilized a four-dense-one-sparse strip cropping pattern with the high-yielding 'Jimai 22' winter wheat cultivar. Two primary irrigation treatments were implemented:

  • T1: Subsurface Sprinkler Irrigation
  • T2: Shallow Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Both treatments received two irrigations, with T1 applying 76.50 mm twice (total 153 mm) and T2 applying 65.10 mm twice (total 130.2 mm). The field was equipped with an advanced integrated irrigation-fertigation system featuring smart valve control and real-time data uploading, allowing for precise water and nutrient delivery. Drip tapes were shallowly buried for T2, while telescopic sprinkler heads were used for T1.

Data collected included daily meteorological conditions, soil moisture content (0-60 cm depth), canopy cover, aboveground biomass, and final grain yield and components. This comprehensive dataset was crucial for calibrating and validating the AquaCrop-OSPy and PyFAO56 models, ensuring the robust optimization of irrigation strategies specific to this hydro-climatic context.

0.99 R² Coefficient of Determination for Aboveground Biomass Simulation

The AquaCrop-OSPy model demonstrated exceptional accuracy in simulating aboveground biomass, achieving an R² of 0.99 for both irrigation treatments (T1 and T2). This indicates a near-perfect fit between simulated and observed biomass accumulation, reinforcing the model's reliability for predicting crop growth under various irrigation regimes.

Advanced ROI Calculator

Estimate the potential return on investment for implementing an optimized AI-driven irrigation strategy in your operations.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Our AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating AI-driven precision irrigation into your agricultural operations.

01. Discovery & Strategy

Initial consultation to understand your current irrigation practices, crop types, soil conditions, and water resources. Define specific goals for yield improvement, water savings, and operational efficiency. Identify relevant data sources and system integration points.

02. Data Integration & Model Calibration

Integrate existing meteorological, soil, and crop data. Deploy smart sensors for real-time data collection. Calibrate AquaCrop-OSPy and PyFAO56 models with your farm's specific parameters to ensure accurate simulations of crop growth and soil moisture dynamics.

03. Optimization & Strategy Design

Apply NSGA-II to optimize stage-specific soil moisture control limits and ET-based replenishment ratios, considering multiple objectives like yield and water conservation. Develop tailored irrigation schedules and rules for your farm's unique conditions.

04. System Deployment & Integration

Implement the AI-driven irrigation decision engine and integrate it with your existing smart valve control systems. Set up real-time monitoring dashboards for performance tracking and alerts. Conduct initial testing and fine-tuning.

05. Training & Continuous Improvement

Provide comprehensive training for your team on operating and monitoring the new AI system. Establish protocols for ongoing data collection, model refinement, and performance evaluation to ensure long-term sustainability and maximize ROI.

Ready to Optimize Your Agricultural Operations?

Harness the power of AI to achieve unprecedented efficiency, yield, and sustainability in your farming practices. Our experts are ready to guide you.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking