ENTERPRISE AI ANALYSIS
A benchmark of expert-level academic questions to assess AI capabilities
This report distills key insights from the cutting-edge research on AI benchmarks, particularly Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), and translates them into actionable strategies for enterprise AI adoption. Understand the true capabilities and limitations of advanced LLMs, and how to leverage these findings for your business.
Executive Impact & Key Metrics
This research introduces Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), a multi-modal benchmark of 2,500 expert-level academic questions across various subjects. It demonstrates that state-of-the-art LLMs show low accuracy and calibration on HLE, highlighting a significant gap between current AI capabilities and human expert performance. HLE aims to provide a precise measure of AI progress and inform research and policymaking.
0
Questions in HLE
0
Avg LLM Accuracy on HLE
Dozens
Subjects Covered
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
HLE Benchmark
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a novel, multi-modal benchmark designed to assess Large Language Model (LLM) capabilities at an expert academic level. It consists of 2,500 challenging questions across mathematics, humanities, natural sciences, and other fields. Questions are original, unambiguous, and not easily searchable, requiring deep reasoning and expert knowledge.
Enterprise Implications:
- Provides a more precise measure of frontier LLM capabilities.
- Highlights the current limitations of LLMs in expert-level academic reasoning.
- Informs future research directions for developing more capable AI.
- Serves as a common reference point for AI progress assessment by scientists and policymakers.
LLM Performance Gap
State-of-the-art LLMs demonstrate low accuracy and poor calibration on HLE, achieving significantly less than 10% accuracy on average and high RMS calibration errors (above 70%). This contrasts sharply with their 90%+ accuracy on older, saturated benchmarks like MMLU. The gap indicates that current LLMs struggle with expert-level, closed-ended academic questions requiring deep reasoning and non-trivial knowledge synthesis.
Enterprise Implications:
- Current LLMs lack expert-level academic reasoning and knowledge.
- Models often provide incorrect answers with high confidence, indicating poor uncertainty calibration.
- The saturation of existing benchmarks means they no longer effectively measure progress at the frontier.
- Further research is needed to improve LLM accuracy and calibration on complex tasks.
Benchmark Design
HLE questions are developed by nearly 1,000 subject-matter experts globally. They are multi-modal (text and image), include both multiple-choice and exact-match formats, and undergo a rigorous multi-stage review process. This includes an initial LLM difficulty check (questions are rejected if LLMs can solve them), human expert review, and a public review period to ensure quality, difficulty, and resistance to simple internet lookup or database retrieval.
Enterprise Implications:
- Ensures high quality and challenge level for evaluating advanced AI capabilities.
- Reduces bias and ensures questions require genuine reasoning, not just retrieval.
- The multi-stage review process enhances the reliability and validity of the benchmark.
- Promotes global collaboration among experts in AI evaluation and development.
90% vs. <10%
% Accuracy on MMLU vs. <10% on HLE for frontier LLMs
While frontier LLMs achieve over 90% accuracy on popular benchmarks like MMLU, they demonstrate less than 10% accuracy on HLE. This stark contrast underscores HLE's effectiveness in revealing the current limitations of AI at the expert academic frontier.
HLE Dataset Creation Pipeline
The HLE dataset creation involves multiple stages to ensure difficulty and quality.
Launch (70,000 attempts)
→
LLM Difficulty Check (13,000 submissions)
→
Expert Reviews & Refinements (6,000 candidates)
→
Approval by Organizers & Experts
→
HLE Public & Private Sets (2,500 questions)
| Feature | Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) | Traditional Benchmarks (e.g., MMLU) |
|---|---|---|
| Difficulty Level |
|
|
| Question Type |
|
|
| Subject Coverage |
|
|
| Development |
|
|
LLM Calibration & Reasoning
On HLE, frontier LLMs not only exhibit low accuracy but also poor calibration, frequently providing incorrect answers with high confidence (RMS calibration errors above 70%). This indicates a lack of self-awareness regarding their limitations.
Furthermore, an analysis of inference time reveals that while accuracy initially increases with more reasoning tokens, this trend reverses after a certain threshold. This suggests that simply increasing reasoning budget is not always optimal; future models need to improve both raw accuracy and computational efficiency.
The ability to accurately assess uncertainty and use reasoning budgets effectively are critical areas for AI improvement highlighted by HLE.
Estimate Your Potential AI Impact
See how adopting expert-level AI capabilities, as measured by HLE, could translate into tangible benefits for your enterprise.
Estimated Annual Savings
$0
Hours Reclaimed Annually
0
Strategic AI Implementation Roadmap
A phased approach to integrating advanced AI capabilities, leveraging insights from benchmarks like HLE.
Phase 1: Needs Assessment & Pilot
Identify core business functions that require expert-level reasoning. Conduct a small-scale pilot project using HLE-aligned AI solutions to validate initial impact and gather performance data.
Phase 2: Capability Development & Customization
Based on pilot results, develop or customize AI models to address specific expert tasks. Focus on improving accuracy and calibration on HLE-like problems relevant to your domain. Integrate multi-modal reasoning where necessary.
Phase 3: Integration & Scaled Deployment
Integrate refined AI solutions into existing enterprise workflows. Implement robust monitoring and feedback mechanisms to continuously evaluate performance against expert human benchmarks and drive further improvements. Scale deployment across relevant departments.
Phase 4: Continuous Improvement & Frontier Exploration
Establish a continuous learning loop for AI models, incorporating new data and benchmark insights. Explore new frontier AI capabilities and evolving HLE-Rolling datasets to maintain competitive advantage and push the boundaries of enterprise AI applications.
Ready to Elevate Your Enterprise AI?
The insights from HLE demonstrate the next frontier of AI capabilities. Partner with us to strategically navigate this landscape and implement solutions that deliver true expert-level performance for your business.
Ready to Get Started?
Book Your Free Consultation.
Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!
Lets Discuss Your Needs
Select a Date
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat