Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: A Fused Multi-Channel Prediction Model of Pressure Injury for Adult Hospitalized Patients—The “EADB" Model

Enterprise AI Analysis

A Fused Multi-Channel Prediction Model of Pressure Injury for Adult Hospitalized Patients—The “EADB" Model

Pressure injuries (PIs) are a growing global concern, with traditional prevention methods showing limited improvement. This study introduces a novel fused multi-channel prediction model, dubbed "EADB," leveraging advanced machine learning algorithms to identify adult hospitalized patients at high risk of developing PIs. Using a comprehensive first-hand dataset from Palestinian hospitals, the model achieves high predictive accuracy and identifies critical factors for early intervention.

Executive Impact & Performance Snapshot

The "EADB" model, specifically its optimal Random Forest configuration (Model D), demonstrates robust predictive capabilities, offering significant improvements for patient care and resource allocation.

0.000 Accuracy (Model D)
0.000 Precision (Model D)
0.000 F1 Score (Model D)
0.000 AUC (Model D)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Robust Multi-Channel Approach

The study employed a multi-phase quantitative approach, utilizing a case–control experimental design. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records of three hospitals in Palestine between March 2022 and August 2023. An initial dataset of 49,500 patients was balanced to 1110 for training and testing.

Data Processing & Algorithms: Comprehensive data preprocessing, cleaning, and visualization were performed. Feature engineering identified key variables. Eight machine learning algorithms were utilized: Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree (DT), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Models were validated using five-fold cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning to ensure robust and generalizable performance.

Leading Performance with Random Forest

The "EADB" model demonstrated strong performance across various configurations. The Random Forest (RF) algorithm consistently emerged as the best performer, particularly in Model D. This configuration achieved an impressive accuracy of 0.962, precision of 0.942, recall of 0.922, F1 score of 0.931, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.922.

These metrics highlight the model's high reliability in identifying patients at risk of pressure injury, outperforming traditional assessment methods and offering a proactive tool for healthcare providers.

Key Predictive Factors Identified

Model D identified specific, highly predictive factors for pressure injury, moving beyond reliance on traditional scores like Braden. These critical variables include:

  • Age: Older age is associated with increased risk.
  • Moisture: Skin moisture levels, often related to incontinence or wound exudate.
  • Activity: Patient's level of physical activity or mobility.
  • Length of Stay (LOS): Longer hospital stays significantly increase risk.
  • Systolic Blood Pressure (BP): A key physiological indicator.
  • Albumin: A significant biomarker, reflecting nutritional status.

These factors provide actionable insights for nurses and care teams to implement targeted prevention strategies effectively.

96.2% Accuracy of the Best Predictive Model (Model D, Random Forest)

Enterprise Process Flow: EADB Model Construction

Collect Data
Prepare Data
Feature Engineering
Training and Deploying the Model
Model Comparison
Model Selection

Random Forest Performance Across Model Configurations

Model Accuracy Precision Recall F1 Score AUC Key Differentiators
Model A (High Correlation Factors) 0.988 0.980 0.978 0.979 0.978
  • Age, Diagnosis, Operation, Anesthesia Type, Braden Scale, LOS, Mechanical Ventilator, Specific Lab Tests (Alb, WBC, Protein), Specific Medications.
Model B (Statistical Significance Factors) 0.992 0.985 0.986 0.985 0.986
  • Gender, Age, Diagnosis, Anesthesia (Type & Duration), Braden Scale (all subscales), LOS, Vital Signs, Mechanical Ventilator, Extensive Lab Tests, Specific Medications.
Model C (Feature Importance Factors) 0.838 0.718 0.584 0.601 0.584
  • Gender, Hospital Name, Braden Scale (all subscales), Albumin, Temperature, Specific Medications.
Model D (High Correlation without Braden Scale) - RECOMMENDED 0.987 0.977 0.979 0.978 0.979
  • Age, Moisture, Activity, Length of Stay, Systolic BP, Albumin (Minimal, Practical Set).

The "EADB" Model: A Practical Leap in Pressure Injury Prediction

The "EADB" model (specifically Model D) offers a distinct advantage over existing predictive tools. While models A and B achieved slightly higher raw performance metrics, their reliance on a larger number of features, including complex clinical variables (e.g., mechanical ventilation status, multiple biomarkers, and specific medications) or hospital-specific categories (department type, accreditation), presented significant challenges for broad applicability and operational efficiency.

Model D's Strength: Simplicity & Versatility

Model D, in contrast, streamlines the prediction process by utilizing a more practical and accessible set of six predictive factors: age, moisture, activity, length of stay (LOS), systolic blood pressure (BP), and albumin. This focused approach means:

  • Reduced Data Burden: Eliminates the need for extensive biomarker panels or detailed medication lists that may not be available for all patients or in all hospital settings.
  • Wider Applicability: Does not depend on specific department types (e.g., ICU only) or hospital accreditation status, making it suitable for all adult hospital settings.
  • Independence from Traditional Scales: Uniquely, Model D achieves high accuracy without relying on the Braden scale, offering flexibility for hospitals using alternative assessment tools or seeking a more objective, data-driven approach.

This pragmatic design makes Model D highly efficient, more practical for real-world integration, and a significant step forward in enabling proactive, data-informed pressure injury prevention across diverse healthcare environments.

Calculate Your Potential AI-Driven ROI

Understand the tangible impact our AI solutions can have on your operational efficiency and cost savings. Adjust the parameters to see a personalized estimate.

Estimated Annual Savings
Hours Reclaimed Annually

Your AI Implementation Journey

Our structured approach ensures a seamless integration of AI, from initial strategy to long-term impact and continuous optimization.

01. Discovery & Strategy

Comprehensive assessment of your current operations, data infrastructure, and business objectives. We identify key areas where AI can deliver maximum impact and define a tailored strategy for your organization.

02. Data Preparation & Model Development

Collection, cleaning, and preparation of your enterprise data. Our expert team designs and trains custom AI models, ensuring they align with your specific predictive needs and integrate with existing systems.

03. Integration & Deployment

Seamless integration of the AI model into your current workflows and IT infrastructure. We ensure minimal disruption and provide robust deployment support, making the solution operational.

04. Performance Monitoring & Optimization

Continuous monitoring of model performance, accuracy, and impact. We provide ongoing support, regular updates, and iterative enhancements to ensure your AI solution delivers sustained value and adapts to evolving needs.

Ready to Transform Your Operations with AI?

Schedule a personalized consultation with our AI specialists to explore how the "EADB" model, or a custom AI solution, can drive efficiency and innovation in your enterprise.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking