Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on students' motivation and engagement

Enterprise AI Analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on students' motivation and engagement

This meta-analysis of 33 studies (n=1099 students) reveals that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) significantly boosts university students' motivation and engagement across cognitive, behavioural, emotional, and agency dimensions. Key findings include medium to high effect sizes for all engagement types (Hedges's g: Cognitive 0.59, Behavioural 0.52, Emotional 0.64, Agency 0.87, Motivation 1.20). Moderator analyses highlight subject category, learning strategy, and GenAI usage context as influencing factors, particularly in STEM fields and independent learning. Individual and small group learning with ChatGPT is especially effective for cognitive and emotional engagement. The study provides actionable insights for optimizing learning strategies and GenAI integration in higher education.

Executive Impact: Key Findings at a Glance

0 Studies Analyzed
0 Students Impacted
0 Avg. Motivation Effect (g)
0 Engagement Dimensions Improved

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Motivation

GenAI significantly enhances student motivation (Hedges's g = 1.20, p < .001). This effect is strongly moderated by subject category (STEM benefits more), learning strategy (independent learning is more effective), and GenAI usage context (classroom-only and extracurricular-only show significant benefits).

0 Average Hedges's g for Motivation

GenAI Motivation Enhancement Flow

Independent Learning Strategy
Individual/Small Group Context
STEM Subject Category
GenAI-Assisted Learning
Increased Student Motivation
Factor Optimal Conditions
Subject Category
  • STEM fields (Science & Engineering) show strongest benefits.
Learning Strategy
  • Independent study leads to higher motivation gains.
Context of GenAI Usage
  • Classroom-only and extracurricular-only usage are highly effective.
Type of GenAI
  • Educational AI Chatbots show strong results, ChatGPT also effective.

Cognitive Engagement

GenAI-assisted learning leads to higher cognitive engagement (Hedges's g = 0.59, p < .001). This is significantly moderated by subject category, with STEM fields showing stronger effects. Individual and small group learning with educational GenAI (like ChatGPT) are particularly effective.

0 Average Hedges's g for Cognitive Engagement

Cognitive Gains in STEM Education

In a study involving STEM students, the integration of educational GenAI chatbots into a blended learning environment significantly enhanced cognitive engagement. Students demonstrated improved problem-solving and critical thinking skills when interacting with AI tools providing personalized feedback. This highlights the potential for GenAI to facilitate deeper understanding in complex subjects.

  • ✓ Personalized feedback from GenAI boosts cognitive effort.
  • ✓ STEM subjects benefit greatly from AI-assisted cognitive tasks.
  • ✓ Educational GenAI (e.g., specific chatbots) shows strong effectiveness.

Cognitive Engagement Pathway

Educational GenAI (GPT=1)
Mixed Situational Context
Individual Learning (Cooperation=1)
Enhanced Cognitive Engagement

Emotional Engagement

GenAI-enhanced groups exhibit greater emotional engagement (Hedges's g = 0.64, p < .001). Subject category and learning strategy are significant moderators. Individual learning with general GenAI (like ChatGPT) is particularly effective in fostering interest and enjoyment.

0 Average Hedges's g for Emotional Engagement
Approach Emotional Impact
Individual Learning with General GenAI (ChatGPT)
  • Increases interest and enjoyment (100% confidence).
  • Supports personalized emotional responses to learning.
Collaborative Learning
  • Less pronounced effect compared to independent learning on emotional engagement.

Behavioural Engagement

GenAI improves behavioural engagement (Hedges's g = 0.52, p = .005). Sample size is a key moderator. The impact is higher in studies with smaller sample sizes (<100 participants) and in independent learning strategies.

0 Average Hedges's g for Behavioural Engagement

Behavioural Shifts in Smaller Groups

Studies with fewer than 100 participants demonstrated a more significant improvement in behavioural engagement when GenAI was introduced. This suggests that in smaller, more controlled settings, GenAI tools can lead to more observable and measurable changes in student participation and explicit learning behaviours. The effect was also stronger in independent study contexts.

  • ✓ Smaller sample sizes (<100) show greater behavioural impact.
  • ✓ Independent study contexts are more conducive to behavioural gains.
  • ✓ GenAI encourages active participation and specific learning behaviours.

Agency Engagement

GenAI demonstrates a high effect size on agency engagement (Hedges's g = 0.87, p < .001). No significant moderators were found for agency engagement, suggesting a universal positive impact regardless of context variables like subject, learning strategy, or GenAI type.

0 Average Hedges's g for Agency Engagement
Moderator Impact on Agency Engagement
Subject Category
  • No significant moderating effect observed.
Learning Strategy
  • No significant moderating effect observed.
Context of GenAI Usage
  • No significant moderating effect observed.
Type of GenAI
  • No significant moderating effect observed.

Estimate Your Enterprise AI Impact

Calculate potential annual savings and hours reclaimed by integrating GenAI into your educational operations. Adjust variables to see the transformative potential.

Estimated Annual Savings Calculating...
Estimated Annual Hours Reclaimed Calculating...

GenAI Integration Roadmap for Higher Education

Phase 1: Pilot & Policy Development

Initiate small-scale GenAI pilots in specific departments (e.g., STEM, Humanities) and begin drafting institution-wide GenAI policies, focusing on ethical use, data security, and academic integrity. Gather baseline motivation/engagement data.

Phase 2: Targeted Integration & Training

Based on pilot feedback, integrate GenAI tools into identified high-impact areas (e.g., independent learning modules, personalized feedback systems). Provide comprehensive training for educators on effective GenAI pedagogy and prompt engineering, emphasizing differentiated impacts.

Phase 3: Scaled Deployment & Continuous Improvement

Expand GenAI integration across more disciplines and learning contexts. Establish continuous monitoring for student motivation and engagement metrics, adapting strategies based on real-time performance and feedback, particularly for agency engagement.

Ready to Transform Your Learning Environment?

Schedule a personalized consultation with our AI integration specialists today.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking