Enterprise AI Analysis
AI Identification: An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Governance in Digital Enterprises
Authored by Di Kevin Gao, Jingdao Chen, and Shahram Rahimi on February 9, 2026.
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems grow more powerful, autonomous, and embedded in critical infrastructure, their identification and traceability become foundational to regulatory oversight and sustainable digital governance. In digitally transformed enterprises, long-term sustainability depends on transparent, accountable, and lifecycle-governed AI systems, all of which require verifiable identity. This study proposes a conceptual and architectural framework for AI identification, combining technical and governance mechanisms to support lifecycle accountability. The framework integrates five components: model fingerprinting, cryptographic hashing, blockchain-based registration, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP)-based proof of possession, and post-deployment structural change screening. We introduce a dual-layer identifier, consisting of a machine-verifiable primary hash and a human-readable secondary identifier, anchored in a tamper-resistant registry. Identity validation is supported by selective ZKP-based verification at governance-defined checkpoints, while post-deployment changes are monitored using Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance (LZJD) as a governance-oriented screening signal rather than a semantic performance metric. The framework establishes an enforceable and transparent identity infrastructure that enables continuity, auditability, and policy-aligned oversight across AI system lifecycles. By embedding AI identification within enterprise architecture and governance processes, the proposed approach supports sustainable innovation, strengthens institutional accountability, and provides a foundation for selective, policy-defined verification during digital transformation.
Executive Summary: AI Identification for Sustainable Digital Governance
This report details a crucial framework for AI identification, essential for robust regulatory oversight and sustainable digital governance in today's rapidly evolving digital enterprises. As AI systems become more powerful and integrated into critical infrastructure, their verifiable identity and traceability are paramount. Our proposed framework addresses this by combining technical mechanisms like model fingerprinting, cryptographic hashing, and blockchain registration with governance mechanisms such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) for verification and Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance (LZJD) for post-deployment drift detection. This dual-layer identifier system—comprising a machine-verifiable primary hash and a human-readable secondary ID—is anchored in a tamper-resistant registry, ensuring continuous auditability and policy-aligned oversight throughout the AI system lifecycle. By integrating AI identification into enterprise architecture and governance, we enable sustainable innovation, enhance institutional accountability, and facilitate selective, policy-defined verification crucial for digital transformation.
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
Integrated AI ID Framework
The proposed framework integrates five core components: model fingerprinting, cryptographic hashing, blockchain-based registration, zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) for proof of possession, and post-deployment structural change screening. This holistic approach ensures verifiable identity and lifecycle accountability for AI systems.
Embedding AI ID in AIDAF FSAO Process
AI Identification is mapped directly into the Adaptive Integrated Digital Architecture Framework (AIDAF) FSAO process (Communication, Integration, Adaptation, Digitalization). This ensures AI IDs become core artifacts for governance, enabling consistent metadata and verifiable system identity across the enterprise lifecycle.
Enterprise Process Flow
Primary & Secondary Hashing
A two-layered identification system is used: a machine-verifiable primary hash (SHA-256 over model weights, Hw) and a human-readable secondary identifier. The primary hash provides cryptographic commitment, while the secondary hash (e.g., US-0000000A-GPT-40-20250613-3F7X-K9) supports transparency and human-readability for public registries and audit reports.
| Feature | Primary Hash | Secondary Hash |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose |
|
|
| Input |
|
|
| Format |
|
|
| Security |
|
|
| Use Case |
|
|
Post-Deployment Drift Detection
To maintain identity continuity while accommodating minor model updates, Lempel-Ziv Jaccard Distance (LZJD) is proposed for post-deployment structural change screening. It detects significant structural divergence, triggering re-registration or governance review when thresholds are exceeded. This balances operational burden with accountability.
Blockchain-Based Registration & ZKP Verification
AI IDs are immutably stored on a blockchain registry, paired with Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) verification. This enables AI systems to prove their registered identity at governance checkpoints without revealing proprietary model internals, ensuring authenticity and transparency while preserving trade secrets. The registry is tamper-resistant and audit-friendly.
AI Governance ROI Calculator
Estimate the return on investment for implementing a robust AI Identification and Governance framework.
Implementation Roadmap for AI Identification
A phased approach to integrate AI identification into your enterprise architecture for sustainable digital governance.
Phase 1: Framework Assessment & Planning (2-4 Weeks)
Evaluate current AI systems, define governance objectives, and develop a detailed implementation plan. Establish clear roles and responsibilities.
Phase 2: Technical Integration & Registry Setup (4-8 Weeks)
Integrate model fingerprinting, hashing, and blockchain registry components. Develop ZKP circuits and establish initial registration protocols.
Phase 3: Pilot Deployment & Verification (3-6 Weeks)
Pilot the AI ID framework on selected high-risk AI models. Test ZKP verification at governance checkpoints and refine drift detection thresholds.
Phase 4: Enterprise-Wide Rollout & Training (6-12 Weeks)
Scale the AI ID framework across all relevant AI systems. Conduct comprehensive training for development, operations, and governance teams.
Phase 5: Continuous Monitoring & Optimization (Ongoing)
Implement continuous monitoring of AI IDs, drift detection, and compliance. Regularly review and optimize the framework based on performance and evolving regulatory landscape.