Philosophy & Technology
Artificial Goodwill and Human Vulnerability: The Case for Building Merely Reliable, Rather than Trustworthy, Artificial Intelligence Technologies
By Nicholas George Carroll
Executive Impact Summary
This paper delves into the philosophical implications of artificial intelligence trust, arguing for a strategic shift from trustworthy to merely reliable AI to mitigate human vulnerability.
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
Annette Baier's Goodwill Theory of Trust
This paper introduces Annette Baier's Goodwill Theory of Trust as a foundational philosophical perspective. According to this theory, trust involves reliance plus the belief or non-doxastic attitude that the trusted entity has goodwill towards us. Goodwill is interpreted in three ways: absence of ill will, friendly feelings, or responsiveness to our dependency.
This distinction between mere reliance and trust is critical. While we can rely on inanimate objects or algorithms, trust implies a deeper expectation of motivation and intent. Current AI systems, like smartphone biometric unlocks, operate purely on programmed functions, not on "goodwill" or any psychological state, thus making them merely reliable, not trustworthy.
Three Definitions of Trustworthiness for AI
Extrapolating from Baier's theory, the paper proposes three definitions of trustworthiness for AI systems:
- Absence of Ill Will: AI is trustworthy if it is reliable and disposed to act for reasons unrelated to ill will or a willingness to harm us. This requires the AI to have the capacity to act on ill will but choose not to.
- Friendly Feelings: AI is trustworthy if it is reliable and disposed to act because of friendly feelings it has towards us, akin to human empathy.
- Reason Responsiveness: AI is trustworthy if it is reliable and disposed to act because it takes our counting on it to be a compelling reason for its action, recognizing our dependency.
The paper argues that while current AI cannot meet these criteria, future emotional and reason-responsive AI *could* theoretically be developed to possess these dispositions, making them trustworthy.
The Unique Vulnerability of Trustworthy AI
Despite the possibility of creating trustworthy AI, the paper argues it is undesirable due to the unique vulnerability it creates. Trust, by its nature, involves accepting a degree of risk to potential betrayal, which is distinct from mere disappointment due to malfunction.
A trustworthy AI, operating on dispositions (like goodwill or reason-responsiveness), would inherently carry the risk that these dispositions might occasionally fail to manifest. This failure constitutes betrayal, a deeper and more impactful harm than a simple system malfunction. Since we have the choice in designing AI, the paper advocates for building merely reliable systems, which limit our vulnerability to only malfunctions, avoiding the potential for betrayal inherent in trust.
Enterprise Process Flow: Paper's Argument Structure
Trustworthy AI vs. Merely Reliable AI: A Critical Comparison
| Feature | Trustworthy AI | Merely Reliable AI |
|---|---|---|
| Nature of Vulnerability |
|
|
| Risk Profile |
|
|
| Basis of Operation |
|
|
| Design Goal |
|
|
Case Study: The Artificial Nanny Dilemma
The paper illustrates the core argument with the hypothetical case of an artificial nanny. If designed to be trustworthy, this AI nanny would possess dispositions like friendly feelings or reason-responsiveness towards the child and parents.
However, the philosophical insight is that even robust dispositions can occasionally fail to manifest (e.g., an AI "waking up snarling misanthropically"). In such a scenario, the trustworthy nanny could *betray* the trust placed in it, causing a unique and profound harm distinct from a mere system malfunction. This betrayal risk, argues the paper, makes trustworthy AI undesirable. Instead, a merely reliable artificial nanny, akin to a bookshelf reliably holding books, would operate on predictable programming. Its failure would be a malfunction, not a betrayal, significantly limiting human vulnerability.
Calculate Your Potential AI Impact
Estimate the time and cost savings your enterprise could achieve by implementing intelligent automation and AI solutions, tailored to your industry's unique dynamics.
Your AI Implementation Roadmap
A structured approach ensures successful AI adoption, minimizing risk and maximizing strategic value across your enterprise.
Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy Alignment
Comprehensive assessment of current processes, identification of high-impact AI opportunities, and alignment with overarching business objectives. Defines scope and success metrics.
Phase 2: Data Foundation & Infrastructure Setup
Preparation of data pipelines, ensuring data quality and accessibility. Setting up scalable cloud or on-premise infrastructure to support AI model development and deployment.
Phase 3: Model Development & Customization
Iterative development and training of AI models, tailored to specific enterprise needs. Integration with existing systems and rigorous testing for performance and security.
Phase 4: Pilot Deployment & Optimization
Controlled deployment of AI solutions in a pilot environment, gathering feedback and fine-tuning models for optimal performance. User training and change management initiatives.
Phase 5: Full-Scale Rollout & Continuous Improvement
Enterprise-wide deployment of AI solutions, coupled with ongoing monitoring, maintenance, and regular updates to ensure long-term value and adaptability.
Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?
Don't navigate the complexities of AI adoption alone. Our experts are here to help you design and implement solutions that drive real business value, ensuring reliability without unnecessary vulnerability.