Enterprise AI Analysis: Automating Societal Impact Assessment with ChatGPT
Executive Summary
This analysis explores the groundbreaking research paper, "Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations," by Kayvan Kousha and Mike Thelwall. The study provides critical insights into how Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can be leveraged to automate the evaluation of complex, qualitative narratives, such as project impact reports. The core finding for enterprises is profound: AI can serve as a powerful, high-speed assistant for assessing the value and impact of projects, but its effectiveness hinges on a 'less is more' approach to data input and meticulously engineered instructions.
The research demonstrates that feeding an LLM just the title and summary of a report yields more accurate evaluations than providing the entire document. Furthermore, by programming the AI with stricter, more critical evaluation criteria, its performance aligns more closely with human expert judgment. For businesses, this translates into a viable strategy for rapidly triaging project proposals, assessing post-mortem reports, and standardizing performance reviews, saving thousands of hours while enhancing consistency. This paper provides a foundational roadmap for developing custom AI solutions that augment, rather than replace, expert human decision-making in value assessment.
Deconstructing the Research: Key Findings for Enterprise AI Strategy
The study's methodology involved testing ChatGPT's ability to score over 6,000 academic impact reports against scores from human experts. The results offer a clear blueprint for how enterprises should approach similar AI implementations.
Finding 1: The 'Less is More' Principle for AI Input
Counterintuitively, providing more data to ChatGPT resulted in poorer performance. The AI became overly generous, assigning top scores when given full reports. The optimal input was just the Title and a concise Summary. This highlights a critical lesson for enterprise AI: context is key, but verbosity can be a vulnerability. An effective AI evaluation system must be trained to focus on the most salient information, avoiding the noise of excessive detail.
Finding 2: The Power of Prompt Engineering
Default instructions are insufficient for complex tasks. The researchers significantly improved the AI's accuracy by modifying the system prompts to be more stringent. By framing the AI as a "very strict academic expert" and asking for more nuanced scoring (including half-points), they coerced the model into a more critical and realistic evaluation mode. This proves that the true power of custom AI lies not just in the model itself, but in the expert-level instructions that guide its analysis.
Finding 3: Iteration Breeds Accuracy
A single AI-generated score can be unreliable. The study found that performance improved by querying the AI multiple times for the same report and averaging the results. This "consensus" approach smooths out randomness and leads to a more stable, trustworthy prediction. For enterprise applications, this means building systems that leverage iterative analysis to ensure robust and defensible outputs.
Finding 4: Quantifiable Disciplinary Bias
The AI exhibited clear biases, consistently scoring reports from health and science fields higher than those from arts and humanities. While this reflects patterns in the training data, for an enterprise, it's a critical risk to manage. A custom AI solution must be carefully calibrated and potentially fine-tuned for different business units (e.g., Engineering vs. Marketing) to account for inherent differences in how "impact" is articulated and measured. The goal is not to eliminate differences, but to ensure the evaluation is fair and context-aware.
Enterprise Applications: From Academic Theory to Business Value
The principles uncovered in this research can be directly applied to solve common enterprise challenges, transforming subjective, time-consuming processes into efficient, data-assisted workflows.
Calculating the ROI: Quantifying the Impact of AI-Assisted Evaluation
Implementing a custom AI solution for report analysis offers significant return on investment, primarily through drastic reductions in manual effort for initial reviews and triage. This frees up high-value experts to focus on strategic analysis rather than administrative screening. Use our interactive calculator below to estimate the potential time savings for your organization.
Your Custom AI Implementation Roadmap
Leveraging these insights requires a strategic approach. At OwnYourAI.com, we guide enterprises through a proven five-phase process to build a custom AI evaluation engine tailored to your specific goals and internal standards.
Test Your Knowledge
See if you've grasped the key takeaways from this analysis. Take our short quiz!
Ready to Augment Your Evaluation Process with Custom AI?
The research is clear: AI is ready to serve as a powerful co-pilot for your expert teams, enhancing efficiency and consistency. The key is a custom solution built on the principles of concise inputs, expert-level prompting, and awareness of domain-specific context. Let's discuss how we can build an AI engine that understands what "impact" means for your business.
Book a Free Strategy SessionReady to Get Started?
Book Your Free Consultation.
Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!
Lets Discuss Your Needs
Select a Date
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat