Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Advances in artificial intelligence and robotics in joint arthroplasty

Enterprise AI Analysis

Advances in Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Joint Arthroplasty

This special edition of Arthroplasty brings together novel research on AI and robotics in joint replacement surgery. With increasing demand for joint replacements and pressure on healthcare systems, technology-assisted surgery (AI and robotics) offers potential for improved precision, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness. The collection includes 12 papers covering various applications in hip and knee arthroplasty, from predictive diagnostics to intra-operative robotics and revision surgery. While promising, further validation, replication of results, and evidence-based implementation are crucial. The editorial highlights the exciting future of technology incorporation into arthroplasty care pathways to address rising demands and ensure predictable, efficacious, and sustainable outcomes.

Executive Impact Snapshot

Integrating AI and robotics in arthroplasty can significantly enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and free up valuable clinical time. Our analysis projects substantial improvements for healthcare organizations.

0% Projected Efficiency Gain with AI
0 Estimated Annual Cost Savings
0 Clinical Hours Reclaimed Annually

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Knee Arthroplasty - Imaging & Planning
Hip Arthroplasty - Robotics & Outcomes
Knee Arthroplasty - Intra-operative Assessment & Outcomes
AI in Arthroplasty - Reviews & Future Directions

Arithmetic hip-knee angle measurement on long leg radiograph versus computed tomography—inter-observer and intra-observer reliability

This Australian study explored using CT-based image captures to calculate hip-knee-angle (aHKA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) planning, contrasting it with standard long-leg alignment radiographs (LLR). Findings suggest CT-based aHKA is more reproducible, overcomes measurement barriers (patient positioning, contractures, body habitus), and shows high correlation with LLR, potentially obviating routine LLRs.

94% CT-based aHKA accuracy compared to LLR (with Navopt)
Feature CT-based aHKA LLR Standard
Reproducibility
  • More reproducible for key angular indices
  • Potential for variability
Measurement Barriers
  • Overcomes issues like patient positioning, contractures, body habitus
  • Susceptible to positioning inconsistencies, contractures
Observer Seniority Impact
  • No demonstrated effect on precision/repeatability
  • Potential for observer variability
Workflow Impact
  • Potentially obviates routine LLRs, streamlining pre-operative workflow
  • Routine acquisition often required

Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs

This collaborative work assessed the value of intra-operative imageless robotic TKA for determining coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification, comparing it to LLRs. Using the OMNI-botics system, 94% of cases achieved accurate CPAK determination with the optimized wear assumption (Navopt), suggesting imageless robotic navigation reliably calculates CPAK parameters, potentially making routine LLRs unnecessary.

0.6° Mean measurement error for CPAK parameters (Navlit)

Enterprise Process Flow

Pre-operative LLRs (Gold Standard)
Intra-operative Imageless Robotic Navigation (OMNI-botics)
CPAK Parameter Calculation (Navopt/Navlit)
Comparison of Classification Consistency
Reliable CPAK Determination

Impact of change in coronal plane alignment of knee (CPAK) classification on outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA

This retrospective study explored the impact of changes in constitutional CPAK grouping on patient satisfaction after robotic-assisted TKA (using ROSA® system). In 134 patients, 93.28% were 'happy' with outcomes. While CPAK classification changed in 86.57% of patients, this study suggests widely-accepted dissatisfaction rates (15-20%) after TKA cannot be explained by post-operative changes in native joint line or CPAK classification.

93.28% Patients happy with outcomes after robotic-assisted TKA

CPAK Grouping & Patient Satisfaction

A core dogma in TKA suggests that changes from the patient's native coronal plane alignment (CPAK) grouping to a new post-operative alignment lead to patient dissatisfaction. This study directly challenged this. Using the ROSA® robotic system for TKA, researchers found that even when the CPAK classification changed in a significant majority of patients (86.57%), a very high percentage (93.28%) reported satisfaction at one year post-surgery. This suggests that the widely-cited 15-20% dissatisfaction rate post-TKA is likely not attributable to changes in CPAK grouping, opening new avenues for understanding patient outcomes.

Stem anteversion is not affected by proximal femur geometry in robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty

This Italian study investigated the impact of proximal femoral geometry on THA stem position using the Stryker Mako® system and 'enhanced' workflow. In 102 patients undergoing THA with an Accolade® II stem, the mean native FNV was 6.6°, and final stem version was 16.4°. The study suggests aligning the stem to native femoral anteversion 10mm above the lesser trochanter reliably achieved target version (5°-25°) in 96.1% of cases, indicating robotic assistance helps achieve optimal anteversion regardless of complex femoral geometry.

96.1% Cases achieving target stem anteversion (5°-25°)

Enterprise Process Flow

Standardized CT-based Pre-operative Scan
Determination of Femoral Neck Version (FNV)
Robotic-Assisted THA (Stryker Mako®)
Align Stem to Native FNV (10mm above lesser trochanter)
Achieve Target Stem Anteversion

Improved perioperative narcotic usage patterns in patients undergoing robotic-assisted compared to manual total hip arthroplasty

This collaborative study retrospectively compared post-operative narcotic consumption in patients undergoing primary THA with robotic-assistance versus conventional methods. Using an anterior approach and ROSA® Total Hip System, 211 patients were analyzed. Findings showed significant reductions in post-operative analgesic consumption (MMEs) with robotic-assisted technique, highlighting its value for rapid recovery pathways and optimized pain control. The exact mechanism for reduced pain still needs further elucidation.

Significant Reduction in Post-Operative Narcotic Consumption (MMEs)
Metric Robotic-Assisted THA Manual THA
Narcotic Consumption (MMEs)
  • Significant reductions post-operatively
  • Higher consumption rates
Early Pain Control
  • Optimized for rapid recovery pathways
  • Less optimized for early pain management
Recovery Pathways
  • Supports rapid recovery / short-stay arthroplasty
  • May have longer recovery times due to pain

Reliability of pre-resection ligament tension assessment in imageless robotic assisted total knee replacement

This Chinese prospective study aimed to quantify the reliability of pre-resection ligament tension assessment using an imageless, robot-assisted TKA approach (CORI TKR system). In a small cohort of 24 knees, the study found good-to-excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability for assessing knee tension in all positions, except 'flexion lateral'. More senior surgeons consistently produced larger gaps during knee balance. This work needs replication with other systems.

Good-to-Excellent Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability for Knee Tension Assessment

Pre-Resection Ligament Tension with Robotics

Accurate assessment of ligament tension ('balance') is critical for successful TKA. Traditionally, this relies on a surgeon's subjective 'feel' or post-cut sensor devices. This study explored the reliability of a pre-resection, imageless robotic approach (CORI TKR system). It found good-to-excellent reliability for intra- and inter-rater assessments across most knee tension positions, offering a quantitative, objective measure earlier in the surgical workflow. Interestingly, senior surgeons tended to produce larger gaps during balance assessments, suggesting a potential for standardization and improved training through such systems.

No evidence of mid-flexion instability after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty as assessed by intraoperative pressure sensors

This Australian study investigated mid-flexion instability after uncomplicated TKA using intra-operative pressure sensors (Verasense) combined with the Mako® robotic system. In 72 knees, no significant pressure difference (above 15 pounds) was found in the medial compartment, and no patient showed a pressure difference exceeding 15 pounds at 45° across both compartments. The authors concluded no clinical or statistical evidence of mid-flexion instability with Mako®-assisted primary TKAs using a single-radius, cruciate-retaining prosthesis.

0 Patients with >15lb pressure difference at 45° (indicating instability)
Assessment Point Medial Compartment Lateral Compartment
10° Flexion Pressure
  • No significant difference
  • Statistically higher pressures (P<0.001)
45° Flexion Pressure
  • No significant difference
  • Statistically higher pressures (P<0.001)
90° Flexion Pressure
  • No significant difference
  • Statistically higher pressures (P<0.001)
Overall Instability (at 45°)
  • No patient showed >15lb difference
  • No patient showed >15lb difference

Robotic-assisted differential total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants: surgical techniques and preliminary results

This study reports kinematic evaluation and early clinical outcomes of TKAs performed using patient-customized iTotal CR TKA (Conformis) with TiRobot Recon Robot (TINAVI). The novel combination allows enhanced intra-operative assessment (gap quantification, force determination, live femoral-tibial tracking). In 17 knees, the system achieved 'excellent' intra-operative joint kinematics and acceptable radiographic/clinical outcomes. The authors propose it leads to improved functional and patient satisfaction, particularly for diverse knee morphotypes.

6 Weeks for custom implant processing time

Enterprise Process Flow

Pre-operative Imaging for Custom Implant Design
iTotal CR TKA Implant Fabrication (Conformis)
Intra-operative Robotic-Assistance (TiRobot Recon)
Real-time Assessment (Gap, Force, Tracking)
Optimized Joint Kinematics & Clinical Outcomes

Multicenter, prospective cohort study: immediate postoperative gains in active range of motion following robotic-assisted total knee replacement compared to a propensity-matched control using manual instrumentation

This multicenter study assessed immediate post-operative range-of-movement (ROM) gains in 216 robot-assisted TKAs (ROSA® system) vs. 216 propensity-matched manual TKAs. Robotic TKA patients showed significant improvements in ROM at one and three months (mean 6.9° and 4.9° degrees better) and a higher odds ratio (2.15) of achieving 90° flexion at one month. The authors conclude robotic TKA enables faster active ROM recovery, emphasizing change in ROM as a key metric for patient satisfaction.

6.9° Mean ROM improvement at one month (Robotic vs. Manual)
Metric Robotic-Assisted TKA Manual TKA
ROM at 1 Month
  • Significantly improved (mean 6.9° better)
  • Lesser ROM gains
ROM at 3 Months
  • Significantly improved (mean 4.9° better)
  • Lesser ROM gains
Achieving 90° Flexion (1 Month)
  • Higher odds ratio (2.15)
  • Lower odds of achieving
Recovery Speed
  • Faster recovery of active ROM
  • Slower active ROM recovery

Robotic-assisted revision total knee arthroplasty: a novel surgical technique

This Australian paper describes the early follow-up (up to 18 months) of 19 patients undergoing robotic-assisted revision TKA (Stryker Mako® system). It outlines pre-, peri-, and post-operative considerations, addressing challenges like in situ metalwork and bone stock preservation. The authors provide insight into future extensions of robotic technologies for revision surgery, noting the need for software modifications and improved image acquisition techniques for these complex cases.

19 Patients in robotic-assisted revision TKA cohort

Enterprise Process Flow

Pre-operative CT Scan (with modifications for metalwork)
Bony Surface Registration (Stryker Mako®)
Addressing Bone Stock Preservation
Anatomic Joint Line Maintenance
Early Follow-up & Outcomes

Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

This PRISMA review assessed AI applications, specifically machine learning (ML), in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after TKA. Identifying 11 studies of 'fair' methodologic quality, the review categorized applications into PJI prediction, diagnosis, antibiotic application, and prognosis. It suggests ML-based approaches hold value but cautions for more research to validate widespread uptake, highlighting convincing AUC data and the potential of AI-informed datasets for improving benchmark standards-of-care.

11 Studies included in ML for PJI prevention review
Application Area ML Strengths Validation Needs
PJI Prediction
  • Ability to identify high-risk patients early
  • Further research for widespread uptake
Diagnosis
  • Potential for consistent and reproducible diagnostic pathways
  • More robust evidence from diverse settings
Antibiotic Application
  • Optimized dosing and timing based on patient data
  • Clinical trials for efficacy and safety
Prognosis
  • Predicting long-term outcomes and recurrence risk
  • Longitudinal studies with large cohorts

A role for artificial intelligence applications inside and outside of the operating theatre: a review of contemporary use associated with total knee arthroplasty

This meta-synthetic review examines AI applications in TKA surgery across pre-, intra-, and post-operative phases. It highlights current AI strengths in mass data handling, outcome prediction, and administrative tasks, offering time and cost savings. While acknowledging promising AI technologies, it cautions that some have failed to surpass human-driven standards, emphasizing the need for evidence-based validation to keep pace with the rapidly growing hype and ensure generalizable, reproducible applications.

Pre-, Intra-, Post-operative Phases of TKA where AI is applicable

AI's Role Across TKA Workflow

AI offers significant potential across the entire TKA patient journey. Pre-operatively, it aids in patient selection, outcome prediction, and optimized templating. Intra-operatively, AI complements robotics in precision planning and execution. Post-operatively, it assists in monitoring recovery, predicting complications, and optimizing rehabilitation. While AI excels in data handling and administrative tasks, the review stresses the critical need for robust, generalizable evidence to validate AI's superiority over human-driven standards, urging a cautious approach amidst growing technological hype.

Advanced ROI Calculator

Estimate the potential return on investment for integrating AI and Robotics into your orthopaedic practice. Adjust the parameters below to see tailored projections.

Projected Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI & Robotics Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach ensures successful integration and maximum impact. Here’s a typical phased roadmap for AI and robotics adoption in arthroplasty.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy (1-2 Months)

Initial assessment of current arthroplasty workflows, data infrastructure, and clinical objectives. Identify key pain points where AI/Robotics can add most value. Develop a tailored strategy aligned with facility goals and regulatory requirements. Includes stakeholder workshops and technology readiness assessment.

Phase 2: Pilot Implementation & Validation (3-6 Months)

Select a pilot project (e.g., robotic-assisted TKA planning, AI for PJI prediction). Implement the chosen technology in a controlled environment. Collect baseline and post-implementation data to validate efficacy, reproducibility, and user satisfaction against clinical standards. Includes clinician training and initial data integration.

Phase 3: Integration & Scaling (6-12 Months)

Based on successful pilot validation, integrate the technology into broader clinical pathways. Expand deployment to additional surgical teams or joint types (e.g., THA). Establish robust data pipelines for continuous monitoring and feedback. Refine workflows based on real-world performance and gather long-term outcome data.

Phase 4: Optimization & Advanced AI (12+ Months)

Ongoing optimization of AI models and robotic protocols based on cumulative data. Explore advanced AI applications like predictive analytics for personalized patient pathways or integration with broader health system data. Focus on achieving cost-efficiencies, sustained outcome improvements, and expanding research collaborations. Continuous training and support.

Ready to Transform Your Arthroplasty Practice?

The future of joint replacement is here. Partner with us to seamlessly integrate cutting-edge AI and robotic solutions, enhancing patient outcomes and operational efficiency.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking