Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Experimental and numerical research on crowd squeezing pressure of platform screen doors of rail transit

Enterprise AI Analysis

Revolutionizing Rail Transit Safety: Automated Crowd Squeezing Pressure Testing

This research addresses the challenges of low accuracy and manual inefficiency in inspecting crowd squeezing pressure on rail transit platform screen doors. It introduces an automatic control airbag inflation loading and inspection technology, utilizing an air compressor and an intelligent pressure control module. The system allows adjustable pressurization speed and simultaneous deformation data detection. Experimental and numerical results confirm its effectiveness in providing uniform, linear load simulation across all platform door specifications, significantly improving detection authenticity, efficiency, and reducing resource investment for laboratory and on-site testing.

Executive Impact & Key Performance Metrics

Our innovative solution delivers measurable improvements in operational efficiency and safety compliance for rail transit infrastructure.

0 Detection Accuracy Control
0 Improved Detection Efficiency
0 Reduced Resource Investment

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Crowd Squeezing Pressure Simulation

The simulation of crowd compression load is a crucial component of structural performance testing for platform screen doors. This research highlights the limitations of traditional manual control detection methods, which suffer from low accuracy and inefficient operation. The proposed technology aims to provide a more authentic and uniform simulation, meeting standard linear load requirements. Numerical analysis using finite element models helps validate experimental findings, showing good consistency in displacement calculations.

Automatic Control Airbag System

The core innovation is an automatic control airbag inflation loading and inspection technology. It uses an air compressor as the air source, regulated by an intelligent pressure monitoring and control module. This system enables adjustable pressurization speed and automatically controls airbag inflation and deflation. It supports various airbag types (strip and uneven) to simulate line and surface loads uniformly, ensuring consistent and accurate application of crowd squeezing pressure across the platform door surface. Key components include a DC power supply, pressure sensors, regulating valves, and solenoid valves for precise control.

Experimental Validation & Numerical Analysis

The technology was rigorously tested on platform door prototypes, including fixed, sliding, and emergency doors. Displacement acquisition devices, such as displacement meters, were used to gather experimental data at specific measurement points. Finite element calculation models were developed to simulate the loading conditions, allowing for a direct comparison between experimental and numerical results. The findings indicate that the system can control detection accuracy to within <1 mm, with most projects showing less than 20% deviation (and often <10%) between test and calculated values, validating the system's reliability and precision.

Broader Protective Structure Applications

Beyond platform screen doors, this airbag-based automatic detection method is applicable to various building and peripheral protective structures that are subject to crowd squeezing, such as protective railings (metal and glass). It offers a superior alternative to traditional impact load tests using shotgun bags or concentrated loads from jacks, providing a more continuous and large-scale simulation of crowd pressure. This makes it ideal for testing structures like school corridor railings, ensuring their safety under extreme conditions.

Enterprise Process Flow: Automated Airbag Loading

Fix Airbag Slot & Set Height
Install Platform Door & Set Gap (30mm)
Place Airbag, Connect Circuit/Air Path
Close Air Switch, Power Control Mechanism
Open Regulating Valve, Pressurize Airbag
Pressure Reaches Set Value, Stop Pressurization
Test Complete, Activate Relief Valve, Exhaust Air
Release Residual Air, Reset for Next Test

Comparative Analysis: Testing Methods

Feature Traditional Manual Method Automated Airbag System
Accuracy Low, inconsistent manual application High, <1mm control, precise pressure regulation
Efficiency Manual, labor-intensive, time-consuming setup Automatic, rapid pressurization and release, adjustable speed
Load Uniformity Non-uniform, concentrated loads (jacks, bags) Uniform, simulates linear/surface crowd load accurately
Resource Investment High manpower, specific material resources Reduced manpower, optimized material use
Simulation Authenticity Limited for continuous crowd squeezing scenarios High, realistic simulation of continuous crowd pressure
On-site Applicability Challenging due to manual handling and setup Suitable for both laboratory and on-site testing

Key Achievement

<1mm Detection Accuracy Controlled Within for Platform Door Components

Case Study: Project 3 — Navigating Data Variances

In Project 3, while the deviation ratio between test and calculated values was 40%, the absolute difference in displacement was only 0.78 mm. This highlights the importance of considering both relative and absolute error in assessing detection accuracy. The system's ability to maintain a small absolute error, even with a higher relative deviation, confirms its practical reliability for engineering applications. Factors influencing such deviations may include prototype installation quality, model simplification, and data collection nuances.

Key Takeaway: Practical accuracy in engineering applications considers both absolute and relative errors. Small absolute errors, even with higher percentage deviations, can still meet stringent requirements.

Calculate Your Potential AI-Driven ROI

Estimate the transformative impact of automating complex engineering analysis and testing within your organization.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A typical timeline for integrating advanced AI solutions for engineering testing and analysis.

Phase 01: Discovery & Strategy

Initial consultation, needs assessment, and strategic planning for integrating automated testing systems. Define scope, objectives, and success metrics.

Phase 02: System Design & Customization

Detailed design of the airbag loading system, software integration, and customization to specific platform door models or protective structures. Includes hardware procurement and software development.

Phase 03: Pilot Deployment & Testing

Deployment of the prototype system in a controlled environment. Conduct pilot tests, data collection, and initial validation against numerical models. Refine system based on feedback.

Phase 04: Full Integration & Training

Scale the solution across all required testing facilities. Comprehensive training for your engineering and technical teams on system operation, maintenance, and data analysis.

Phase 05: Continuous Optimization & Support

Ongoing monitoring, performance tuning, and technical support to ensure maximum efficiency and accuracy. Future upgrades and enhancements are provided.

Ready to Transform Your Engineering Testing?

Schedule a personalized consultation with our AI specialists to explore how automated crowd squeezing pressure detection can benefit your enterprise.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking