Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Modelling STEM students' intention to learn artificial intelligence (AI) in Ghana: a PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach

Enterprise AI Analysis

Modelling STEM students' intention to learn artificial intelligence (AI) in Ghana: a PLS-SEM and fsQCA approach

This study investigates factors influencing Ghanaian STEM students' intentions to learn AI, providing insights for educational policy. Using partial least squares structural equation modelling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), the analysis revealed multiple combinations of individual and contextual factors that drive students' intentions to learn AI. Fostering AI literacy and career relevance boosts motivation. We recommend integrating AI literacy into STEM curriculum and increasing AI resource access as a national policy priority.

Executive Impact & Key Metrics

This research provides crucial insights for the Ministry of Education (MoE) and Ghana Education Service (GES) to build a technologically competent STEM workforce. By understanding the multifaceted drivers and barriers to AI learning among pre-tertiary students, policymakers can design targeted interventions. The findings highlight the importance of cultivating AI-supportive learning cultures, providing adequate resources, and addressing psychological barriers like AI anxiety to prepare future generations for an AI-driven labor market and contribute to Ghana's digital transformation.

66% Variance in AI Learning Intention (R²)
0.954 Solution Consistency (fsQCA)
0.352 Subjective Norm Impact (β)
-.334 AI Anxiety Impact (β)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Study Design & Sample Size Adequacy

The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional survey with purposive sampling of 233 AI-familiar STEM students. G*Power analysis confirmed the sample size was robust for 8 predictors, a medium effect size, and 95% power, requiring a minimum of 160 respondents.

233 Total Respondents

Dual-Method Analytical Approach

Data Collection (Structured Questionnaires)
PLS-SEM (Direct & Mediating Effects)
fsQCA (Configurational Pathways)
Comprehensive Insights

Methodological Advantages

Feature PLS-SEM fsQCA
Causal Pathways
  • Identifies linear relationships
  • Quantifies direct and indirect effects
  • Uncovers multiple causal configurations
  • Identifies necessary and sufficient conditions
Sample Size
  • Suitable for small-to-moderate samples
  • Ideal for small-to-medium samples
  • Case-oriented analysis
Output Nuance
  • Provides average effects
  • Reveals equifinality (multiple paths to outcome)
  • Captures conjunctural causation

Influence of AI Anxiety

AI anxiety emerged as the strongest negative predictor of AI learning intention (β = -0.334, p < 0.001), significantly inhibiting engagement.

-0.334 AI Anxiety (Beta Weight)

Theory Integration Effectiveness

Theoretical Lens Key Constructs Supported Unique Contributions
UTAUT2
  • Subjective Norm
  • Facilitating Conditions
  • Explains external social and environmental influences on AI adoption
Self-Determination Theory (SDT)
  • Self-Efficacy
  • Social Good
  • Relevance
  • Highlights intrinsic motivational drivers like competence and purpose

Perceived Usefulness Paradox

Despite recognizing AI's potential, perceived usefulness unexpectedly showed a negative influence (β = –0.135, p = 0.004) on learning intention. This suggests that while students acknowledge the value of AI, structural barriers like limited access to tools or unclear career prospects may diminish the perceived feasibility of benefiting from AI, thus weakening the link to actual learning intention.

Policy Recommendations Pathway

Foster AI Literacy
Address AI Anxiety (Workshops)
Integrate AI into STEM Curriculum
Provide Resources & Mentorship
Strengthen Social Norms & Relevance
Build Technologically Competent Workforce

Variance Explained by Model

The PLS-SEM model accounted for 66% of the variance in AI learning intention (R² = 0.660), demonstrating strong explanatory power.

66% Variance Explained (R²)

Key Policy Action Areas

Area Specific Actions Expected Outcome
Curriculum Integration
  • Integrate AI literacy into STEM curricula
  • Tailor AI content to disciplines
  • Strong foundational knowledge
  • Enhanced perceived relevance
Resource Provision
  • Equip schools with modern tech tools
  • Ensure stable internet access
  • Provide AI learning materials
  • Enhanced facilitating conditions
  • Increased engagement
Support & Culture
  • Capacity-building workshops for self-efficacy
  • Teacher training programs
  • Peer collaboration
  • Reduced AI anxiety
  • Boosted confidence and motivation

Calculate Your Potential AI ROI

Estimate the impact AI could have on your enterprise efficiency and cost savings.

Annual Cost Savings $-
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A typical phased approach to integrating AI, tailored to maximize your enterprise's success.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

Comprehensive assessment of current operations, identification of AI opportunities, and development of a tailored AI strategy and roadmap.

Phase 2: Pilot & Validation

Deployment of a pilot AI solution in a controlled environment, rigorous testing, and validation of performance against key metrics.

Phase 3: Scaled Integration

Full-scale integration of AI solutions across relevant departments, ensuring seamless workflow adaptation and employee training.

Phase 4: Optimization & Future-Proofing

Continuous monitoring, performance optimization, and strategic planning for future AI advancements and expanded applications.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Our experts are ready to guide you through every step of your AI journey, from strategic planning to seamless implementation and beyond.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking