Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Perceptions of STEM education and artificial intelligence: a Twitter (X) sentiment analysis

Enterprise AI Analysis

Perceptions of STEM education and artificial intelligence: a Twitter (X) sentiment analysis

This study reveals that public sentiment on AI in STEM education is predominantly neutral (56.1%) and positive (40.6%), with a small percentage of negative sentiments (3.3%). Trust, anticipation, and joy are the most prevalent emotions. Over time, interest in AI in STEM education has surged, particularly since 2020, peaking in early 2023. Key topics influencing sentiment include trending data science, future innovators, teaching & education chat, and coding & physical computing.

Key Metrics & Insights

Explore the core findings that shape public perception of AI in STEM education.

0 Neutral Sentiment
0 Positive Sentiment
0 Negative Sentiment
0 Top Emotion: Trust

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Overall Sentiment & Emotions

This section provides an overview of the public's general attitude towards AI in STEM education and the specific emotions associated with these perceptions.

56.1% Neutral Sentiment

A significant portion of public sentiment regarding AI in STEM education is neutral, suggesting a balanced or undecided view among many users. This indicates ongoing discussions without strong emotional leaning, as observed in fluctuating neutral sentiments peaking in March 2022.

40.6% Positive Sentiment

Nearly half of the public expresses positive sentiment toward AI in STEM education, indicating an optimistic outlook and acceptance of its potential benefits. Positive sentiments were notably high initially and peaked in April 2021, suggesting an initial period of optimism, consistent with the acceptance of technology among educators and the public generally.

3.3% Negative Sentiment

A small minority of users express negative sentiments, highlighting specific concerns or reservations about AI's impact on STEM education. While negative sentiments were minimal, they showed a noticeable increase starting in early 2022, peaking at 28 in February 2022, potentially reflecting increased scrutiny and mixed feelings as the timeframe progressed. Concerns about potential misuse, bias, or lack of understanding may contribute to this.

4207 Top Emotion: Trust

Trust is the most frequently expressed emotion, indicating a foundational belief in the integrity and reliability of AI in STEM education. This aligns with the idea that AI has the potential to support STEM instruction and that stakeholders, including teachers, hold positive attitudes towards its utility. The presence of trust, anticipation, and joy likely correlates with positive AI and STEM education mentions.

Emotional Aspect Positive Emotions Mixed/Negative Emotions
Anticipation
  • Future potential of AI in STEM
Joy
  • Benefits for teaching and learning
Trust
  • Reliability and integrity of AI tools
Surprise
  • Unexpected advancements
  • New applications
  • Uncertainty about AI's full potential
  • Mixed reactions
Fear
  • Concerns about misuse or bias
  • Anxiety over job displacement
  • Lack of understanding
Anger
  • Ethical issues (e.g., privacy, bias)
  • Misinformation
Sadness
  • Limitations of current AI tools
  • Exacerbating inequalities
Disgust
  • Poor implementation
  • Unreliable data

The emotional analysis reveals a diverse spectrum of feelings. Positive emotions like anticipation, trust, and joy are predominant, suggesting optimism. However, notable presences of fear, anger, surprise, sadness, and disgust highlight existing concerns regarding potential misuse, bias, and the rapid evolution of AI, indicating a need for greater understanding and ethical guidance.

Evolution of Public Sentiment

This section tracks how public perceptions of AI in STEM education have changed over time, reflecting evolving discussions and adoption patterns.

Sentiment Evolution Timeline (2020-2023)

April 2020: High positive sentiment, minimal negative
April 2021: Positive sentiments peak (233 mentions), negative lowest
March 2022: Neutral sentiments peak (290 mentions)
Early 2022: Noticeable increase in negative sentiments
February 2022: Negative sentiments peak (28 mentions)
April 2023: Positive sentiments decline (71 mentions)
Overall: Dynamic landscape with initial optimism, increased scrutiny, and mixed feelings

Public sentiment towards AI in STEM education has shown significant fluctuations over time. Initially, positive sentiments were high, peaking in April 2021. Neutral sentiments became more prominent, peaking in March 2022, indicating ongoing discussions. A noticeable, albeit small, increase in negative sentiments in early 2022 suggests growing scrutiny, possibly related to concerns about AI's rapid advancements and ethical implications.

Prevalent Topics & Influences

This section identifies the key themes and discussions that influence public sentiment about AI in STEM education.

Topic Category Key Terms/Impact
Trending Data Science
  • Machine learning
  • AI4ALL
  • Datascience
  • Bigdata
  • 100daysofcode
  • Represents 30.72% of data, focuses on trending data science topics and initiatives for coding beginners. Positive sentiment due to AI's support for coding skills (Jung, 2020).
Future Innovators
  • Technology
  • Learning
  • Future
  • Innovation
  • Accounts for 27.9% of data, discusses future-oriented aspects of AI and its potential to bring innovation to education and other fields. Aligns with futuristic sentiments about AI relating to sci-fi topics and world-changing innovation (Kelley et al., 2021).
Teaching & Education Chat
  • K12
  • Podcast
  • Teaching
  • Edchat
  • Comprises 24.31% of data, emphasizes media's role in technology education and teacher professional development, using tools like podcasts and books for knowledge dissemination (Kennedy et al., 2014; Prestridge, 2019).
Coding & Physical Computing
  • Robotics
  • Coding
  • Robot
  • Programming
  • Represents 17.4% of data, reflects discussions on practical applications of AI in STEM, such as robotics and programming. This category highlights AI's role as an innovation or future technology that can be improved by humans (Diaz & Delgado, 2024).

Four prevalent topics influence public sentiment: Trending Data Science (30.72%), Future Innovators (27.9%), Teaching & Education Chat (24.31%), and Coding & Physical Computing (17.4%). These topics reflect discussions around AI's role in enhancing skills, driving innovation, supporting educators through media, and practical applications like robotics, all contributing to a mostly positive sentiment.

Impact of ChatGPT's Release on Public Discourse

The release of ChatGPT in 2022 significantly amplified discussions around AI in STEM education, generating much public interest and debate. This event highlights how external factors can rapidly shape and influence public perception.

  • Increased Public Interest: Post-ChatGPT release, web searches and social media mentions of AI in STEM education surged, indicating a strong public response to emergent generative AI technologies.
  • Mixed Sentiments: While overall interest increased, the sentiments observed were mixed, reflecting both excitement about AI's capabilities and concerns about its implications (e.g., ethical considerations, potential for bias, impact on academic integrity).
  • Policy and Pedagogy: The rapid uptake and discussion of ChatGPT emphasized the need for policymakers and educators to quickly adapt, providing guidance on equitable access, ethical use, and integration into curriculum, particularly in STEM fields.

The release of ChatGPT in 2022 acted as a catalyst, significantly increasing public attention and discussion around AI in STEM education. This event underscores how rapidly evolving AI technologies can influence public sentiment, creating a dynamic landscape where both optimism and scrutiny coexist, compelling educational stakeholders to develop timely policies and pedagogical strategies.

Calculate Your AI ROI

Estimate the potential return on investment for integrating AI solutions into your enterprise operations.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Reclaimed Human Hours Annually 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A typical phased approach to integrating AI successfully into your enterprise.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

Comprehensive assessment of current operations, identification of AI opportunities, and development of a tailored AI strategy aligned with business objectives.

Phase 2: Pilot & Proof-of-Concept

Implementation of small-scale AI pilot projects to validate technical feasibility, measure initial impact, and refine the solution based on real-world data.

Phase 3: Scaled Deployment

Full-scale integration of validated AI solutions across relevant departments, ensuring seamless adoption, robust infrastructure, and employee training.

Phase 4: Optimization & Future-Proofing

Continuous monitoring, performance tuning, and iterative improvements of AI models. Exploration of new AI advancements for ongoing competitive advantage.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Our experts are ready to guide you. Book a free consultation to discuss your specific needs and how AI can drive your business forward.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking