Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Prediction of extraction uranium concentration and optimization of injection acid concentration using a CNN-GRU–attention model in in-situ uranium leaching

AI-POWERED PREDICTION & OPTIMIZATION

Revolutionizing Uranium Leaching with Advanced Deep Learning

Published: Wei et al. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology (2026) 17:14

This study introduces a deep learning model, CNN-GRU-Attention, to improve the accuracy of uranium concentration prediction and optimize acid injection in in-situ uranium leaching. By integrating CNNs for local feature extraction, GRUs for temporal modeling, and an attention mechanism for critical information enhancement, the model dynamically forecasts trends in extraction uranium concentration. Experimental results demonstrate superior performance (MAE: 0.0543, MSE: 0.0315, R²: 0.915) compared to LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and Transformer models, especially during abrupt concentration changes. Ablation studies confirm the significant contributions of CNN and attention modules. Single-variable simulation analysis reveals a "rise-then-stabilize" pattern for uranium concentration with increasing acid injection, leading to the determination of optimal acid injection concentrations for different residual uranium reserves (11.69 g/L, 10.85 g/L, 11.41 g/L, and 10.99 g/L), thereby achieving production optimization while balancing leaching efficiency and cost.

Executive Impact Summary

This deep learning framework offers a robust solution for predicting uranium extraction and optimizing acid injection, leading to enhanced efficiency and cost savings in mining operations. The model's superior accuracy enables precise control, reducing waste and maximizing resource recovery.

0.0543 Mean Absolute Error (MAE)
0.0315 Mean Squared Error (MSE)
0.915 Coefficient of Determination (R²)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Model Architecture: CNN-GRU-Attention

The proposed model synergistically integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for efficient local feature extraction, Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs) for robust temporal sequence modeling, and a Multi-Head Attention mechanism for dynamically enhancing critical information. This combined approach allows the model to capture short-term variation patterns, long-term dependencies, and assign adaptive importance weights to different features across time steps, significantly improving prediction accuracy and interpretability in complex mining environments.

Experimental Validation: Robustness & Sensitivity

To ensure model robustness and generalizability, a five-fold cross-validation strategy was employed. The average R² of approximately 0.891 across folds, with minor fluctuations, confirms stable predictive performance. Hyperparameter sensitivity studies identified optimal settings for learning rate (0.001), input sequence length (1), and training epochs (400), demonstrating careful tuning for peak performance without overfitting. These rigorous validations confirm the model's reliability in practical applications.

Performance Comparison: Superior Accuracy

The CNN-GRU-Attention model consistently outperformed baseline deep learning models, including LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and Transformer, across all evaluation metrics. Achieved MAE of 0.0543, MSE of 0.0315, and R² of 0.915 highlight its superior predictive accuracy and stability. This advantage is particularly pronounced in segments with abrupt concentration changes, underscoring the effectiveness of integrating attention mechanisms for capturing dynamic temporal features.

Optimization Analysis: Optimal Acid Injection Strategy

Single-variable simulation analysis revealed a "rise-then-stabilize" pattern for uranium concentration with increasing acid injection. This insight enabled the determination of optimal acid injection concentrations for various residual uranium reserves: 11.69 g/L (30 t), 10.85 g/L (25 t), 11.41 g/L (20 t), and 10.99 g/L (15 t). These optimized concentrations balance maximum uranium leaching efficiency with acid consumption, leading to significant cost savings and improved economic viability for mining operations.

0.915 R² on test set (Coefficient of Determination)

The model explains 91.5% of the data variance, indicating high predictive accuracy.

Enterprise Process Flow

Data Collection & Preprocessing
Feature Selection
Data Normalization & Sample Construction
Model Training & Optimization
Performance Evaluation
Results & Analysis

Model Performance Comparison

Model MAE MSE
CNN-GRU-Attention 0.0543 0.0315 0.915
Transformer 0.0623 0.0362 0.854
CNN-LSTM 0.0691 0.0403 0.803
LSTM 0.0767 0.0497 0.751

The proposed CNN-GRU-Attention model significantly outperforms other deep learning models in all key metrics, especially in capturing abrupt concentration changes.

Optimized Acid Injection for Uranium Leaching

Balancing Efficiency and Cost

The study reveals that as injection acid concentration increases, extraction uranium concentration generally exhibits a 'rise-then-stabilize' pattern. Optimal acid injection concentrations were determined for various residual uranium reserves: 11.69 g/L (30 t), 10.85 g/L (25 t), 11.41 g/L (20 t), and 10.99 g/L (15 t). This optimization balances maximum uranium leaching with acid consumption, leading to enhanced economic viability.

Calculate Your Potential ROI

Estimate the impact of AI-driven optimization on your operational efficiency and cost savings.

Annual Savings Potential $0
Hours Reclaimed Annually 0

Your Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating AI into your uranium leaching operations for optimal results.

Data Collection & Preprocessing

Gathering historical operational data, cleaning, imputing missing values, and outlier correction. Standardizing data for model readiness.

Model Development & Training

Constructing and training the CNN-GRU-Attention model using selected features. Hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation to ensure robustness.

Validation & Optimization

Evaluating model performance against test data using MAE, MSE, and R². Conducting ablation studies to confirm module contributions. Performing sensitivity analysis for injection acid concentration.

Deployment & Monitoring

Integrating the trained model into a closed-loop control system for online prediction and dynamic optimization of acid injection. Continuous monitoring and retraining to adapt to changing conditions.

Ready to Transform Your Operations?

Schedule a free consultation to explore how our advanced AI solutions can be tailored to your specific needs and drive significant efficiency gains.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking