Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Research on Innovative Design of Intelligent Leg Rehabilitation Assistive Devices Based on FBS Model

Research Paper Analysis

Research on Innovative Design of Intelligent Leg Rehabilitation Assistive Devices Based on FBS Model

Authors: Yajing Hou*, Xin Liu, Shengzan Yan, Fucheng Lu

Abstract: This study aims at the common problems of current leg rehabilitation assistive devices, such as single functions, poor human-computer interaction experience and insufficient adaptability. It systematically conducts innovative design research on intelligent leg rehabilitation assistive devices using the FBS model. By analyzing the physiological, psychological and behavioral characteristics of adult users with lower extremity dysfunction, a complete design framework is constructed around the three levels of function, behavior and structure. Subsequently, the overall shape of the product, the human-machine dimensions and the interactive interface design were carried out. The mechanical properties and material applicability of the key structure under different postures were verified through finite element simulation analysis. The end-user evaluation indicates that this design scheme has received positive feedback in terms of functional satisfaction, operational experience and emotional identification. This research not only provides systematic theoretical guidance and practical examples for the development of intelligent rehabilitation assistive devices for legs, but also offers referenceable methodological paths for the innovative design of similar medical assistive device products.

Revolutionizing Leg Rehabilitation: An FBS-Driven Approach

This research addresses critical limitations in existing leg rehabilitation devices by leveraging the Function-Behavior-Structure (FBS) model. It delivers a comprehensive design framework for intelligent assistive devices, enhancing user experience, adaptability, and functional effectiveness. The systematic approach, validated by finite element analysis and positive user feedback, sets a new standard for medical assistive device innovation, paving the way for more personalized and effective home rehabilitation solutions.

1.88 Avg. User Safety Score (out of 2)
50% Development Cycle Reduction
3 Design Levels Integrated

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Design Methodology

This category focuses on the systematic application of the Function-Behavior-Structure (FBS) model for innovative product design, ensuring a logical and comprehensive approach from user needs to structural realization.

  • FBS Model provides a hierarchical and progressive analysis process, linking function, behavior, and structure.
  • Systematic mapping from user requirements to product entities for logical derivation and innovation.
  • Framework ensures functional integrity, user experience, and emotional identification are integrated.
  • Adaptability and human-computer interaction are enhanced through this structured design approach.

Technical Validation

This section details the rigorous verification of the proposed design through finite element analysis (FEA) and intelligent control algorithms, ensuring the safety, stability, and effectiveness of the assistive devices.

  • FEA accurately predicts stress concentration and deformation under various postures (standing, sitting).
  • Material selection (titanium alloy, carbon fiber) optimized for strength, lightness, and comfort based on simulation results.
  • PID control algorithm ensures smooth, stable, and precise joint movement tracking during rehabilitation.
  • Gait phase detection using plantar pressure sensors enables adaptive support and low-impedance modes.

User Experience & Impact

Focuses on how the innovative design directly addresses user needs, enhancing rehabilitation effectiveness through improved interaction, comfort, and emotional engagement, validated by end-user feedback.

  • Positive user feedback on functional satisfaction, operational experience, and emotional identification.
  • Design integrates personalized customization and intuitive interfaces suitable for the elderly.
  • Addresses psychological aspects, providing a sense of security and autonomy during use.
  • Aims to meet diverse user needs across the entire rehabilitation cycle, from bedridden to walking periods.

Positive User Feedback on Key Aspects

1.88 Avg. User Safety Score (highest rated)

End-user evaluation indicated strong positive feedback across functional satisfaction, operational experience, and emotional identification. Safety was particularly well-received.

FBS Model: Design Workflow for Innovation

Define Function
Map to Behavior
Realize Structure
User Evaluation & Iteration

Bridging Gaps: FBS Design vs. Traditional Devices

Feature Traditional Devices FBS-Designed Device
Functionality Single functions, limited modes Multi-mode (passive, active assistance, active), intelligent monitoring, walking support
User Interaction Weak, poor adaptability for users/cycles Enhanced, clear feedback, emotional identification, personalized
Adaptability Limited to specific needs/stages Wide adaptability (body types, rehab stages), modular & adjustable
Materials Less optimized for comfort/strength Titanium alloy/Carbon fiber (strength), TPU/memory foam (comfort)
Validation Often lacks systematic verification FEA validated structural integrity, PID for motion control

FEA Validation: Optimizing Structural Integrity

Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was crucial for validating mechanical properties. Simulations for standing and sitting postures identified stress concentration areas, ensuring optimal material selection and reinforcement. For instance, titanium alloy exhibited the smallest and most stable deformation (max 0.36mm standing), while carbon fiber also demonstrated good performance, guiding material selection for lightweight and robust design. This process significantly shortened development cycles and reduced costs.

Key Takeaway: FEA validated structural integrity, optimized material use (Titanium alloy/Carbon fiber), and reduced development time/cost for intelligent leg rehabilitation devices.

Estimate Your Potential AI Impact

Calculate the potential annual savings and hours reclaimed by integrating advanced AI solutions into your enterprise operations, based on industry-specific efficiency gains and cost multipliers.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Total Hours Reclaimed 0 hours

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A phased approach to integrating intelligent assistive device design methodologies into your product development lifecycle, ensuring a smooth transition and maximum impact.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy

Initial consultation to understand current challenges, define project scope, and tailor the FBS design framework to your specific product goals for rehabilitation devices.

Phase 2: FBS Design & Prototyping

Apply the FBS model to develop conceptual designs, conduct material selection, and create high-fidelity prototypes. Includes initial FEA simulations for structural integrity.

Phase 3: Technical Integration & Validation

Integrate intelligent control algorithms (e.g., PID, gait detection) and HMI. Conduct advanced FEA and user evaluations for refinement and optimization.

Phase 4: Scaling & Continuous Improvement

Prepare for manufacturing, implement user feedback loops for continuous product enhancement, and explore advanced features like adaptive learning and multimodal interaction.

Ready to Innovate Your Rehabilitation Devices?

Our FBS-driven design methodology can transform your product development, delivering intelligent, user-centric, and highly adaptable assistive devices. Let's discuss how to apply these insights to your specific challenges.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking