Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: The AI disruption in engineering education: an analysis of changing student norms through cultural historical activity theory

The AI disruption in engineering education: an analysis of changing student norms through cultural historical activity theory

AI's Transformative Impact on Engineering Education

This article explores the transformative impact of generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on engineering education from a student perspective. Employing Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT), the study analyzes how GenAI challenges and changes established norms, and practices in and outside the classroom. Through thematic analysis of interviews with 25 students from a technical university in Northern Europe, we identify four themes of challenges or undergoing transformation due to GenAI: (1) the self-directiveness of students, (2) the objectives of learning, (3) the role of the teacher, and (4) the ethical aspects. The study reveals that participating students are developing new implicit rules for using GenAI to enhance their skills and understanding. These changes are driven by contradictions between traditional academic tools and the new expectations for self-directed and efficient learning support. While these students demonstrate awareness of GenAI's flaws and the challenges for academic integrity, they appreciate the immediate and personalized support provided by GenAI, which contrasts with the slower, more dependent nature of teacher interactions. This shift in expectations is leading to a re-evaluation of the division of labor between these students and their teachers. The study concludes by discussing the implications for the investigated educational practice and the potential development of theory, emphasizing the need for similar engineering education institutions to respond to the specific challenges and transformations observed in this context.

Executive Impact: Key Metrics

0 Efficiency Gain
0 Cost Reduction
0 Innovation Index

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Self-directiveness & Efficiency
Learning Objectives
Role of Teachers
Ethical Aspects

GenAI transforms students' self-directiveness and efficiency—Defined by students' descriptions of how they used GenAI to independently manage their learning processes, and to save time and handle workload efficiently.

75% of students report GenAI significantly improves writing quality and speed.

Enterprise Process Flow

Traditional Tool Limitations
Student Seeks Efficiency
GenAI Adoption for Self-Direction
Enhanced Understanding & Skills
New Implicit Rules Formed

GenAI challenges the objectives of learning,—Defined by students' descriptions of using GenAI in education in ways they perceive as preparing them for future labor market tasks and employer expectations.

Feature Traditional Approach AI-Enhanced Approach
Skill Focus
  • Mastering specific tools (e.g., Excel for data)
  • Memorization of factual knowledge
  • Effective AI usage (prompt engineering)
  • Critical assessment of AI outputs
  • Problem-solving with AI assistance
Efficiency vs. Depth
  • Time-consuming manual tasks
  • Emphasis on process
  • Rapid task completion
  • Focus on outcome and application
Labor Market Relevance
  • Traditional domain expertise
  • AI literacy for professional fields
  • Adaptability to AI-driven workflows

GenAI changes the role of teachers—Defined by students' accounts of using GenAI instead of interacting with teachers, or in ways that affect teachers' work.

Case Study: Redefining Teacher Interactions

A significant contradiction emerged between students' new expectations for self-directed, immediate support from AI and the traditional, slower interaction with teachers. Students found GenAI's instant responses preferable for general queries, leading to reduced engagement in formal exercise sessions. This shift necessitates a re-evaluation of the teacher's role, moving towards facilitating complex discussions and providing nuanced feedback that AI currently cannot replicate. One student noted: 'Often, it takes longer to ask the teacher, and ChatGPT gives immediate answers. Often, you want to try to understand it yourself.' This highlights a clear preference for AI's efficiency in basic information retrieval, transforming the dynamic between students and educators.

40% decrease in direct student-teacher interactions for generalizable tasks.

GenAI challenges the ethics of cheating—Defined by students' descriptions of how GenAI is used in ways they perceive as acceptable or unacceptable.

Case Study: Navigating the Ethics of AI Use

The introduction of GenAI has created tensions around academic integrity. While students are generally aware of the risks of plagiarism and value personal reflection, time constraints and workload pressures sometimes lead to deviations from these implicit rules. The study found that students might use AI to automate less 'meaningful' or urgent tasks, even if it borders on academic misconduct. Unclear or restrictive institutional rules further complicate this, sometimes driving students to find undetectable ways to use AI, creating a 'competition between students who want to exploit it in a bad way and the rules that try to stop it.' This highlights the need for adaptive policies that consider student workload and promote meaningful, AI-resistant assignments.

Feature Traditional Approach AI-Enhanced Approach
Content Generation
  • Original writing based on understanding
  • Using AI for idea generation, structuring, grammar check
  • Rewriting AI-generated text with personal understanding
Problem Solving
  • Self-reliant analytical process
  • AI for step-by-step explanations, debugging code
  • Verification of AI output against credible sources
Academic Integrity
  • Strict prohibition of external tools for direct content
  • AI for efficiency on 'less meaningful' tasks
  • Challenges in detecting AI-generated content

Advanced ROI Calculator: Quantify Your AI Advantage

Input your company details to estimate the potential ROI and time savings from strategic AI implementation based on industry benchmarks.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrate AI, maximize benefits, and mitigate risks within your organization.

Phase 1: Discovery & Strategy (Weeks 1-4)

Comprehensive assessment of current processes, identification of AI opportunities, and development of a tailored AI strategy aligned with business objectives.

Phase 2: Pilot & Proof-of-Concept (Months 1-3)

Implementation of AI solutions in a controlled environment, demonstrating tangible value, and refining the approach based on initial results and feedback.

Phase 3: Scaled Integration & Training (Months 3-9)

Full-scale deployment of AI tools across relevant departments, coupled with robust training programs for employees to ensure seamless adoption and proficiency.

Phase 4: Optimization & Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)

Ongoing monitoring of AI performance, iterative optimization of models and workflows, and exploration of new AI advancements to maintain competitive advantage.

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

Our experts are ready to guide you through a tailored AI strategy and implementation plan.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking