Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: The constructing and empirical research on primary and secondary school teachers' digital competencies in the age of artificial intelligence

The constructing and empirical research on primary and secondary school teachers' digital competencies in the age of artificial intelligence

Unlocking Educator Potential in the AI Era: A Deep Dive into Teacher Digital Competencies

Authors: Haishun Wang, Xiaojing Li, Chenlu Zhang & Zheyuan Kang

Against the backdrop of rapid Al development, the digital competency of primary and secondary school teachers has become a key factor in educational reform. This study aims to construct a digital competency model suitable for primary and secondary school teachers and to validate its effectiveness through empirical research. Using a mixed-method approach, we applied the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation to data collected from 30 teachers and a panel of 30 experts. The comprehensive evaluation results show that teachers perform excellently in the application of digital technology and innovative teaching design, but there is a lack of lifelong learning and professional development, especially professional community participation. The study emphasizes that teachers need to pay attention to data analysis capabilities and technology integration, while strengthening digital ethical awareness, to improve overall educational quality. The model provides a region-level reference for educational policy and teacher training in similar Chinese contexts.

Executive Impact Summary

This analysis distills the core insights from 'The constructing and empirical research on primary and secondary school teachers' digital competencies in the age of artificial intelligence', presenting a clear view of challenges and opportunities for educational leaders.

0 Overall Digital Competency Score
0 Innovative Teaching Design Weight
0 Data Analysis & Feedback Score
0 Digital Ethics Weight (Lowest)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

The research employed a mixed-method approach, combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Data was collected from 30 teachers and a panel of 30 experts to construct and validate a digital competency model. This robust methodology ensured both objective weighting of indicators and a nuanced assessment of teacher performance.

Enterprise Process Flow: Hierarchical Analysis Calculation

Normalize the matrix
Sum matrix elements
Normalize weights (w_i)
Calculate max eigenvalue
Perform consistency check

Applying AHP and Fuzzy Evaluation for Teacher Competency

The study utilized a mixed-method approach, combining the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. AHP was employed to determine the relative weights of different digital competency indicators based on expert judgments, involving 30 experts from various educational backgrounds. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation then assessed teachers' satisfaction levels across these indicators, using data from 30 primary and secondary school teachers. This dual approach allowed for both objective weighting and nuanced performance assessment, providing a robust framework for understanding and improving teachers' digital competencies in the AI era. The method ensured systematic evaluation and reduced subjective biases, providing a scientific basis for decision-making and model optimization.

Building upon the TPACK framework, the study constructed a digital competency model tailored for primary and secondary school teachers in the AI era. This model identifies four primary indicators: Digital Technology Application (C1), Innovative Instructional Design (C2), Digital Ethics and Social Responsibility (C3), and Lifelong Learning and Professional Development (C4), each further broken down into secondary indicators. The model emphasizes not just tool mastery but also algorithmic literacy, data-driven decision-making, and digital ethics, reflecting the evolving demands of intelligent education.

The model's primary indicators are C1: Digital Technology Application, C2: Innovative Teaching Design, C3: Digital Ethics and Social Responsibility, and C4: Lifelong Learning and Professional Development. Secondary indicators include mastery of intelligent educational tools (C11), data analysis and feedback mechanisms (C12), technology integration and adaptability (C13), student-centered learning experience design (C21), interdisciplinary integration (C22), virtual and reality-integrated teaching strategies (C23), cultivation of digital citizenship literacy (C31), equity and inclusivity (C32), digital information security management (C33), continuous self-reflection and improvement (C41), updating of cutting-edge knowledge in digital technology (C42), and participation in professional communities and knowledge sharing (C43).

The comprehensive evaluation results highlighted key strengths and areas for improvement in teachers' digital competencies. While teachers demonstrated excellence in digital technology application and innovative teaching design, a significant gap was identified in digital ethics and professional development.

4.0319 Overall Digital Competency Score (Average)

Primary Indicator Weight Analysis

Competency Area Weight (%) Significance
Innovative Teaching Design (C2) 36.064% Highest importance, core to education in AI era.
Digital Technology Application (C1) 25.476% Crucial foundation for innovative teaching.
Lifelong Learning & Professional Development (C4) 10.697% Important but needs more support/resources.
Digital Ethics & Social Responsibility (C3) 10.005% Lowest weight, insufficient emphasis currently.
10.005% Lowest Weighted Primary Indicator: Digital Ethics & Social Responsibility

Teacher Satisfaction Across Competency Areas (Average Scores)

Competency Area Score (1-5) Interpretation
Mastering Intelligent Educational Tools (C11) 4.14 Excellent performance, widely and effectively applied.
Digital Information Security Management (C33) 4.18 High importance, critical for student protection.
Interdisciplinary Integration (C22) 4.16 Growing recognition, vital for digital learning.
Equality and Inclusivity (C32) 4.16 Necessity for educational equity is recognized.
Data Analysis & Feedback Mechanisms (C12) 3.70 Room for improvement in practical application.
Digital Citizenship Literacy Cultivation (C31) 3.78 Still needs improvement in digital literacy education.
Professional Community Participation (C43) 3.78 Needs strengthening for continuous professional growth.

To address identified gaps, the study provides specific recommendations for enhancing teachers' digital competencies. These include structured training, fostering professional learning communities, and integrating digital ethics into curriculum and teacher development programs.

Cultivation of Digital Technology Application Skills

Through project-based learning and practice-oriented training, teachers can apply digital tools in actual teaching contexts. Utilizing Learning Management Systems (LMS) and fostering professional learning communities are crucial for sharing successful experiences and continuously optimizing technical application skills. Schools should establish robust technical support systems and collect feedback to refine training content.

Enhancement of Innovative Teaching Design Capabilities

By introducing Design Thinking and encouraging self-reflection and peer review, teachers can leverage AI for creative instructional practices. Advocating project-based learning stimulates innovative consciousness and promotes interdisciplinary integration, enabling teachers to design diverse tasks and learning environments that increase student engagement and creativity.

Emphasis on Digital Ethics and Social Responsibility

Digital ethics training through case analysis and simulations will equip teachers to make wise choices regarding data privacy, network security, and information accuracy. Clear digital ethics guidelines should be established, and regular education should enhance ethical awareness, cultivating students' digital citizenship. Biannual iteration of ethical scenarios within professional communities will keep content aligned with emerging AI risks.

Support for Lifelong Learning and Professional Development

Schools should foster learning organizations, encouraging continuous on-the-job learning. Online learning platforms, research activities, and workshops can broaden horizons. Educational departments must provide funding and resources to motivate active participation in digital education research and practice, supporting continuous professional growth.

Calculate Your Potential AI-Driven ROI

The research highlights that effective digital competence can significantly boost teaching efficiency and student outcomes. Use our calculator to estimate potential time and cost savings by investing in advanced teacher training and AI integration strategies.

Estimated Annual Savings Calculating...
Educator Hours Reclaimed Annually Calculating...

Strategic Implementation Roadmap for Digital Competency Initiatives

Based on the empirical findings, a phased approach is recommended to systematically enhance teacher digital competencies across primary and secondary schools.

Phase 01: Assessment & Strategy Development (1-3 Months)

Conduct a comprehensive audit of existing teacher digital competencies and technological infrastructure. Define specific AI integration goals and tailor a training curriculum based on identified gaps, prioritizing digital ethics and data analysis skills.

Phase 02: Foundational Training & Tool Adoption (3-6 Months)

Implement targeted training programs focusing on intelligent educational tools (C11) and innovative teaching design (C2). Establish a pilot group of early adopters and provide dedicated technical support and resources.

Phase 03: Advanced Integration & Ethical Awareness (6-12 Months)

Deepen training in technology integration (C13), interdisciplinary approaches (C22), and foster digital ethics and social responsibility (C3) through workshops and policy integration. Encourage peer-to-peer learning and case study development.

Phase 04: Community & Lifelong Learning Integration (Ongoing)

Establish vibrant professional learning communities (C43) and continuous professional development pathways (C4). Implement mechanisms for self-reflection (C41) and updating cutting-edge knowledge (C42) to sustain growth and adapt to evolving AI trends.

Ready to Elevate Your Educational Institution with AI?

The future of education is here. Partner with us to develop a tailored AI strategy that empowers your educators, enhances student outcomes, and drives institutional excellence.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking