BMC Psychology: Article in Press
University Students' Acceptance of Generative AI Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study
This study examines university students' acceptance of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools through a mixed-methods approach. Key findings indicate that perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU) significantly influence attitudes (ATU) and behavioral intentions to use (BIU). Qualitative data reveals that usage experience, purpose, and gender play a decisive role in shaping opinions, with frequent users and male students showing more positive attitudes. The study highlights the importance of enhancing user experience and integrating GAI tools appropriately in education to boost acceptance.
Key Insights & Impact
0
Students Surveyed
0
Attitude Variance Explained
0
Behavioral Intention Variance Explained
0
Mixed-Methods Approach
Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications
Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
The study validates TAM constructs, showing that Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEU) directly predict Attitude Towards Use (ATU), which in turn predicts Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU) of GAI tools. Indirect effects of PU and PEU on BIU are also confirmed.
68%
ATU Variance Explained by PU & PEU
Impact of User Experience
Qualitative findings reveal that frequent and long-term usage experience correlates with more positive perceptions (e.g., 'wise,' 'facilitating'). Non-users often express 'unknown' or 'worrying' opinions, highlighting the role of direct engagement in shaping attitudes.
Enterprise Process Flow
Non-User Status
→
Rare Use
→
Occasional Use
→
Frequent/Long-Term Use
→
Positive Perceptions
Gender & Usage Purpose Differences
Gender and usage purpose significantly influence GAI acceptance. Male students tend to have higher ATU scores and use GAI for professional purposes, while women lean towards personal development. The purpose of use (e.g., research) strongly predicts PU.
| Factor | Female Users | Male Users |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude Towards Use (ATU) |
|
|
| Perceived Usefulness (PU) |
|
|
| Usage Frequency |
|
|
Mixed-Methods Validation
The sequential explanatory mixed-methods design allowed for a comprehensive understanding, where quantitative findings (SEM) were elaborated and enriched by qualitative insights (metaphor analysis). This triangulation strengthens the validity of the acceptance model.
Holistic Understanding of GAI Acceptance
Our mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative SEM with qualitative metaphor analysis, provided a robust framework for understanding university students' acceptance of GAI tools. For instance, quantitative data showed strong correlations between PEU/PU and ATU/BIU. Qualitative interviews then explained why these perceptions exist, revealing underlying psychological and experiential factors. Students frequently using GAI tools for research, for example, described them as 'wise' or 'facilitating', directly supporting higher PU scores found quantitatively. This synergy ensured a multidimensional view, moving beyond mere statistical correlations to uncover the drivers of user behavior.
Estimate Your Enterprise AI ROI
Project potential annual savings and reclaimed operational hours by integrating generative AI into your workflows, based on industry benchmarks from the study.
Estimated Annual Savings
$0
Annual Hours Reclaimed
0
Phased Implementation Roadmap
A strategic approach to integrating Generative AI, informed by student acceptance factors.
Phase 1: Needs Assessment & Pilot
Identify specific educational and operational needs where GAI can provide value. Conduct small-scale pilots with select user groups to gather initial feedback on usefulness and ease of use. Focus on high-impact areas like personalized learning or research assistance identified in the study.
Phase 2: Customization & Training
Customize GAI tools based on pilot feedback, prioritizing features that enhance perceived usefulness and ease of use. Develop targeted training programs addressing gender-specific usage patterns and digital literacy gaps. Emphasize ethical use and data privacy considerations.
Phase 3: Integration & Scaling
Integrate GAI tools into existing educational platforms and workflows. Gradually scale adoption across departments, continuously monitoring user acceptance and adjusting strategies. Implement robust support mechanisms and feedback loops for ongoing improvement.
Phase 4: Policy & Research
Establish clear institutional policies for GAI use, academic integrity, and responsible AI development. Foster internal research on GAI's impact, efficacy, and ethical implications, contributing to a sustainable and informed adoption ecosystem.
Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?
Book a personalized consultation with our AI strategists to discuss tailored solutions and integration plans for your organization.
Ready to Get Started?
Book Your Free Consultation.
Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!
Lets Discuss Your Needs
Select a Date
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat