Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Unveiling college students' adoption of AIGC in design learning: an integrated model

Enterprise AI Analysis

Unveiling college students' adoption of AIGC in design learning: an integrated model

Authors: Li Zeng, AiHong Wang, YaoWu Huang & Yu Shen

Received: 17 February 2025, Accepted: 5 February 2026

This study investigates the factors that influence college students' intention to use Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) technology in design learning. An extended technology use and diffusion model is proposed and validated by integrating the Artificial Intelligence Device Use Acceptance (AIDUA) model with the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). The present study collected data from 385 Chinese college students majoring in design through online surveys. The proposed model, which includes technology concerns, emotional acceptance, and behavioral transformation, was empirically tested using structural equation modeling (SEM) on data collected from students across different academic levels. The research findings suggest that, in the first stage, relative advantage and compatibility exert a significant and positive influence on both performance expectancy and effort expectancy. However, complexity negatively affects both. In the second stage (emotional acceptance), effort expectancy has a highly positive and significant influence on the adoption and diffusion. Conversely, the impact of performance expectancy on use and diffusion is not substantial. In the final stage (behavioral transformation), both social influence and individual innovation positively and significantly impact the use and diffusion of AIGC. Thus, the empirical results support the integration of AIDUA and IDT. This study provides a conceptual AIGC use and diffusion framework that other researchers ers can use to investigate AIGC-related topics in design learning.

Quantifying the Impact: AIGC in Design Education

Leveraging AIGC presents tangible benefits for educational institutions. Our analysis reveals key performance indicators from the study that demonstrate the potential for enhanced learning outcomes and operational efficiency.

0 Students Surveyed
0/10 Hypotheses Supported
0% Confidence Level

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Technology Concerns Emotional Acceptance Behavioral Transformation

This section delves into how innovation characteristics—relative advantage, complexity, and compatibility—impact students' performance and effort expectancy regarding AIGC in design learning.

89.1% Compatibility's positive impact on Performance Expectancy

Enterprise Process Flow

Relative Advantage
Compatibility
Performance Expectancy
Effort Expectancy
Complexity (Negative Impact)
Feature AIGC Traditional
Efficiency
  • Higher
  • Lower
Creativity
  • Enhanced
  • Limited by manual effort
Iteration Speed
  • Faster
  • Slower
Cognitive Load
  • Reduced (if compatible)
  • Higher
Learning Curve
  • Moderate to Steep
  • Gradual

This part examines whether performance and effort expectancy directly influence the adoption and diffusion of AIGC technology among students, focusing on emotional responses.

36.1% Effort Expectancy's positive influence on Use and Diffusion

Student Workflow Transformation with AIGC

A design student, previously spending 8 hours on initial concept generation, integrated AIGC tools. This led to a 60% reduction in ideation time, allowing for more iterations and higher quality final designs. The student reported increased satisfaction and perceived a direct correlation between effort invested in mastering AIGC and improved project outcomes.

0 hours Time Saved (Ideation)
0x Design Iterations
+0% Project Quality Score

This final section explores how social influence and individual innovation impact the ultimate adoption and diffusion of AIGC within the student community.

53.0% Individual Innovation's strong impact on AIGC Use and Diffusion
Factor Impact Level
Social Influence
  • High
Individual Innovation
  • Very High
Performance Expectancy
  • Low (non-significant)
Effort Expectancy
  • High

Projected ROI: Optimize Your Educational Processes

Estimate the potential savings and reclaimed faculty hours by integrating AI into your institution's design learning curriculum.

Annual Savings Calculating...
Annual Hours Reclaimed Calculating...

Your AI Integration Roadmap

A structured approach ensures successful adoption and maximum benefit from AIGC in your design education programs.

Phase 1: Assessment & Strategy

Develop a tailored AI integration plan, identifying key learning objectives, existing infrastructure, and faculty readiness.

Phase 2: Pilot Program & Iteration

Implement AIGC tools with a pilot group of students and faculty, gather feedback, and iterate based on real-world usage.

Phase 3: Full-Scale Curriculum Rollout

Integrate AIGC across relevant design courses and programs, providing necessary resources and support for widespread adoption.

Phase 4: Advanced Training & Support

Offer ongoing professional development for faculty and advanced workshops for students to master AIGC capabilities and best practices.

Phase 5: Performance Monitoring & Optimization

Continuously track student outcomes, engagement, and faculty feedback to refine AIGC integration and ensure long-term success.

Ready to Transform Your Design Learning with AI?

Connect with our experts to explore how AIGC can elevate your institution's design education, foster creativity, and prepare students for the future.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking