Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Using machine learning and perceptual data to predict student satisfaction of eLearning systems in Ugandan institutions of higher education

Enterprise AI Analysis

Using machine learning and perceptual data to predict student satisfaction of eLearning systems in Ugandan institutions of higher education

The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid transition to eLearning in higher education institutions worldwide, including Uganda, where infrastructural and digital literacy challenges compounded this shift. Predicting student satisfaction with eLearning systems helps institutions evaluate how well these platforms are working, assess their future potential, and make informed decisions. This supports better use of resources, prevents investment in ineffective systems, and enables timely interventions to improve teaching and learning quality. This study developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict student satisfaction based on perceptual data. Various machine learning predictive algorithms were trained on the processed and augmented dataset and tested on the original processed data, including ensemble methods (XGBoost, Random Forest, AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting), traditional classifiers (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors), and neural networks (Multi-Layer Perceptron). Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score to identify the most effective approach for predicting student satisfaction levels. Among the evaluated models, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) achieved the highest mean accuracy of 88.4%, followed closely by XGBoost at 86.6%. The Friedman test indicated statistically significant differences in performance across models (x²(8) = 39.79, p < 0.001). Post-hoc Nemenyi tests identified KNN and XGBoost as significantly outperforming several other classifiers, underscoring their effectiveness for predicting student satisfaction. These findings demonstrate the potential of machine learning models in accurately predicting student satisfaction within eLearning environments. Identifying patterns in usability, content quality, and support services can enable institutions to leverage these predictive insights to optimize resource allocation, improve instructional design, and implement timely interventions that enhance the overall quality and effectiveness of online education.

Unlocking Educational Efficiency with AI

This analysis reveals how advanced machine learning, particularly KNN and XGBoost, can revolutionize the prediction of student satisfaction in eLearning systems. By accurately identifying factors influencing student experience, institutions can proactively optimize resource allocation, enhance instructional design, and implement targeted interventions to improve online education quality. This directly translates into higher student retention, improved learning outcomes, and more effective digital learning environments, especially crucial in resource-constrained regions like Uganda.

0 Prediction Accuracy (KNN)
0 Prediction Accuracy (XGBoost)
0 Model Performance Improvement
0 Resource Allocation Optimization

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

Methodology Overview
Performance Analysis
Implications & Future Work

Predictive Model Development Workflow

Data Collection (Survey Data)
Data Preprocessing & Augmentation
Feature Selection (PCA)
Model Training (9 ML Algorithms)
Performance Evaluation & Comparison
Best Model Selection & Deployment

Key Predictive Model Characteristics

Model Strengths Weaknesses Best Use Case
KNN
  • High accuracy with perceptual data
  • Non-parametric flexibility
  • Computationally intensive for very large datasets
Predicting satisfaction from user feedback
XGBoost
  • Scalable and efficient gradient boosting
  • High accuracy, handles non-linear relationships
  • Requires careful parameter tuning
Large-scale educational datasets, feature importance
Random Forest
  • Ensemble robustness, reduces overfitting
  • Good for complex relationships
  • Can be slower than boosting methods
General purpose classification, feature importance
Logistic Regression
  • Simple, probabilistic interpretability
  • Computationally efficient
  • Linear relationships, binary outcomes
Linear relationships, binary outcomes
AdaBoost
  • Effective for binary classification
  • Iteratively focuses on hard cases
  • Often struggles with multi-class and noisy data
Often struggles with multi-class and noisy data
88.4% Top Model Accuracy: KNN

K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) achieved the highest mean accuracy, demonstrating its strong potential for classifying student satisfaction levels across diverse categories with high precision and recall.

Optimizing eLearning in Ugandan HEIs

By leveraging the predictive power of models like KNN and XGBoost, Ugandan higher education institutions can gain actionable insights into student satisfaction drivers. This enables proactive interventions in content delivery, system usability, and user support, leading to improved learning experiences, higher retention rates, and more effective resource allocation in resource-constrained environments. For example, institutions can identify specific usability issues impacting 'very dissatisfied' students and prioritize system improvements accordingly.

Challenges Addressed:

  • Low student retention
  • Inefficient resource allocation
  • Suboptimal instructional design

Expected Outcomes:

  • Increased student satisfaction by X%
  • Improved course completion rates
  • Data-driven policy development

Calculate Your Potential ROI

Estimate the efficiency gains and cost savings your enterprise could achieve by implementing AI-driven student satisfaction prediction.

Annual Cost Savings $0
Student Engagement Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A structured approach to integrating AI-driven student satisfaction prediction into your educational institution.

Phase 1: Data Audit & Integration (2-4 Weeks)

Assess existing data sources, ensure data quality, and integrate relevant student performance and perceptual data into a unified platform. Establish secure data pipelines for real-time monitoring.

Phase 2: Model Customization & Training (4-8 Weeks)

Adapt predictive models (KNN, XGBoost) to your specific institutional context. Train and validate models using historical and real-time student satisfaction data, optimizing for accuracy and interpretability.

Phase 3: Pilot Deployment & Validation (2-4 Weeks)

Deploy the AI system in a pilot program with a subset of students and courses. Collect feedback, validate predictions against actual satisfaction, and fine-tune the model based on real-world performance.

Phase 4: Full-Scale Integration & Monitoring (Ongoing)

Roll out the AI system across all eLearning platforms. Establish continuous monitoring, regular model retraining, and integrate insights into your instructional design and student support processes.

Ready to Transform Student Experience?

Book a free 30-minute strategy session with our AI experts to discuss how predictive analytics can enhance student satisfaction and outcomes at your institution.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking