Skip to main content
Enterprise AI Analysis: Validity and reliability of the Chinese translation of the attitude scale towards the use of artificial intelligence technologies in nursing (ASUAITIN)- a cross-sectional study

AI in Nursing: A Cross-Sectional Study

Empowering Healthcare with AI: An Enterprise Analysis

This study aimed to validate the Chinese version of the Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Scale (ASUAITIN-C). Conducted with 499 nurses in Sichuan, China, the scale underwent translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric testing. Results confirm ASUAITIN-C as a reliable and valid 15-item, two-factor tool (negative and positive attitudes) with strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.785 overall, 0.920 for negative, 0.948 for positive) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). This tool is crucial for assessing nurses' attitudes towards AI in nursing, aiding in AI implementation strategies in Chinese healthcare.

Key Enterprise Impact Metrics

Leveraging AI effectively yields substantial gains across efficiency, cost, and human capital. Here are the core metrics from our analysis:

0.0 Overall Cronbach's α
0.0 Negative Attitude Cronbach's α
0.0 Positive Attitude Cronbach's α
0.0 Test-retest Reliability (ICC)

Deep Analysis & Enterprise Applications

Select a topic to dive deeper, then explore the specific findings from the research, rebuilt as interactive, enterprise-focused modules.

The study employed a descriptive, cross-sectional, and methodological design. A convenience sampling method recruited 499 clinical nurses from Sichuan Province. The ASUAITIN scale was translated and culturally adapted using the Brislin model, involving forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert consultation, and pilot testing. Structural validity was assessed via EFA and CFA, while reliability used internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Keywords: cross-sectional, validation, Brislin model, EFA, CFA, reliability

The ASUAITIN-C consists of 15 items across two factors, explaining 73.278% of the total variance. Overall Cronbach's α was 0.785, with sub-dimensions at 0.920 (negative attitudes) and 0.948 (positive attitudes). Test-retest reliability (ICC) was 0.91 over two months. These metrics confirm the questionnaire's validity and reliability for assessing nurses' attitudes toward AI in nursing.

Keywords: 15 items, two factors, Cronbach's α, ICC, validity, reliability

The validated ASUAITIN-C is a valuable tool for healthcare institutions to assess nurses' readiness for AI adoption, guiding the customization of AI application scenarios and operational protocols. Understanding nurses' attitudes is crucial for successful AI integration, potentially revolutionizing healthcare delivery and patient outcomes while addressing ethical and practical challenges.

Keywords: AI adoption, nursing readiness, ethical considerations, patient outcomes, healthcare revolution

73.278% Total Variance Explained by ASUAITIN-C Factors

Enterprise Process Flow

Forward Translation
Synthesis
Back-translation
Expert Committee Review
Preliminary Pilot Testing
Final ASUAITIN-C
Aspect Original ASUAITIN Chinese ASUAITIN-C
Structure 15 items, 2 factors 15 items, 2 factors
Overall Cronbach's α 0.910 0.785
Negative Attitude α 0.933 0.920
Positive Attitude α 0.917 0.948
Test-retest Reliability (ICC) Not reported 0.992 (overall)

Streamlining Sepsis Prediction with AI in Sichuan Hospitals

Context: In Sichuan Province, China, tertiary hospitals faced challenges with early sepsis prediction and high documentation burden for nurses.

Challenge: Manual sepsis risk assessment was time-consuming and often delayed, impacting timely intervention. Nurses spent significant time on documentation, reducing direct patient care.

Solution: Implementation of AI-driven systems for sepsis prediction and pressure ulcer risk assessment. These systems integrated patient data for rapid analysis.

Outcome: AI technologies reduced documentation time by 15-20%, allowing nurses to dedicate more time to high-quality patient interactions. Timely sepsis prediction improved patient outcomes.

Calculate Your Potential AI ROI

Estimate the potential savings and efficiency gains for your enterprise by integrating AI technologies, tailored to your operational specifics.

Estimated Annual Savings $0
Annual Hours Reclaimed 0

Your AI Implementation Roadmap

A strategic approach is crucial for successful AI integration. Here's a phased roadmap for your enterprise:

Phase 1: Readiness Assessment

Utilize ASUAITIN-C to assess baseline nurses' attitudes towards AI, identify key concerns, and tailor communication strategies. Establish an expert panel for ethical and practical oversight.

Duration: 1-2 Months

Phase 2: Pilot Implementation & Training

Introduce AI tools in a controlled pilot environment (e.g., one hospital unit). Provide comprehensive training for nurses, focusing on practical application, benefits, and ethical guidelines. Collect feedback for iterative improvements.

Duration: 3-6 Months

Phase 3: Wider Rollout & Continuous Evaluation

Expand AI implementation across more units/hospitals based on pilot success. Continuously monitor the impact on nursing workflows, patient outcomes, and nurse satisfaction. Regularly update training and AI protocols based on performance data and nurse feedback.

Duration: 6-12 Months

Ready to Transform Your Enterprise with AI?

The successful validation of ASUAITIN-C in a Chinese context provides a robust foundation for integrating AI into nursing practice. By understanding and addressing nurses' attitudes, healthcare systems can leverage AI to enhance efficiency, improve patient care, and redefine nursing roles, ultimately fostering a more advanced and patient-centered healthcare environment.

Ready to Get Started?

Book Your Free Consultation.

Let's Discuss Your AI Strategy!

Lets Discuss Your Needs


AI Consultation Booking